The path to peace includes Hamas



I am not, and have never been, a supporter or apologist for Hamas. 

I am a Christian, and Hamas is an avowedly Muslim organization. I am a pacifist, and Hamas believes in armed struggle as the path to liberation. 

Yet, I know that there is no path to peace that does not involve Hamas, as well as some deeply abominable Israeli Jewish and Zionist organizations and politicians. Recognizing the need to speak with Hamas does not in any way constitute support for that organization, its objectives, ideology, or tactics. 

Hamas is a political party, one which also oversaw an entire government structure and all its functions for years, in addition to maintaining an armed resistance force. . . . If it is allowed to engage in political negotiations, it will have to accommodate itself to such realities and enter into serious negotiations that may contradict many of its bombastic positions. As with many other political parties, particularly in Israel, its doctrines, ideology, or statements can be objectionable, especially to the other side. . . . 

The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), as well as the African National Congress (ANC) in South Africa, the Irish Republican Army (IRA), the Algerian Resistance, and all other liberation movements were initially labeled terrorist organizations, and they did indeed commit acts of terrorism and atrocities against civilians. But they were eventually invited into the political process and subsequently moderated their positions in response to new realities and avenues for political engagement.

In the late ’80s and early ’90s, peace activists in Israel, the U.S. and elsewhere conducted a serious campaign to urge politicians to talk to Yasser Arafat and the PLO. We witnessed the PLO change its charter, renounce violence, accept the principles of compromise, and even accept conditions far below their initial demands. These were all changes they remained faithful to, even as the Israelis failed to reciprocate.

Is there any reason why a similar process should not be started with Hamas?

Those who resist this line of thinking are those who are not interested in peace or in an end to war. . . .

Maybe the time has come to consider how and under what conditions Hamas can be brought into a political process and engage in negotiations for a better future for everyone concerned.

Jonathan Kuttab is an international human rights attorney practising in the U.S., Palestine and Israel, and the co-founder of the Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq and co-founder of Nonviolence International. This piece was originally published as part of a larger essay by FOSNA (Friends of Sabeel North America) The FOSNA Blog — Friends of Sabeel North America. Reprinted with permission.



Leave a Reply