Credentials terminated for theologian-academic-pastor

22 October 2020|Web First|

Mennonite Church Eastern Canada recently terminated the ministerial credentials of John D. Rempel of Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ont., following an investigation into complaints of ministerial sexual misconduct. The complaints were brought to the regional church by Marcus Shantz, president of Conrad Grebel University College, Waterloo, Ont., after former students brought allegations of sexual misconduct by Rempel to his attention earlier this year.

Rempel served as chaplain, residence director and adjunct professor at Grebel from 1973 to 1989. The complainants were undergraduate resident students at the college at the time when they experienced the alleged sexual misconduct. With the consent of the alumni involved, Shantz made a formal report to MC Eastern Canada and asked for an investigation. The regional church has oversight over the conduct and credentialing of its ministers. Rempel was ordained in 1982.

In response, MC Eastern Canada appointed an independent investigation team to examine the allegations, following a process outlined in the denominational Ministerial Sexual Misconduct Policy and Procedure manual. After the investigation team reported to the regional church’s Leadership Council, a hearing process took place and the accusations were found to be credible. The council determined that Rempel was guilty of “ministerial sexual misconduct and ministerial misconduct,” and it revoked his ministerial credentials.

In an email to Canadian Mennonite, Rempel said he “unreservedly accepted my wrongdoing,” but he lamented “the absence of empathy for me through the process, and in how the judgment against me has been presented in news releases is a failure of justice and mercy. The rejection of any provision for restorative justice is a failure of justice and mercy.” He added that “the process was set up with only one purpose, that is, passing judgment on the accused, without room for forgiveness, making amends and working toward reconciliation.”

MC Eastern Canada’s Church leadership minister Marilyn Rudy-Froese responded, “MCEC’s Leadership Council, made up of ordained ministers and lay leaders, prayerfully receives investigation findings, hears the perspective of the accused minister, and discerns a way forward, providing concrete steps that the minister can take toward accountability and reconciliation.” She added, “This is one stage of the journey toward wholeness and healing, but it is not the end of the journey. There is much left to be written. We trust that God is always at work, making a way in the wilderness and moving toward shalom for all.”

In its Oct. 20 news release, MC Eastern Canada acknowledged that “John D. Rempel was, and is, for many people, a beloved pastor, professor and theologian. His ministry was wide-ranging and we will have to reconcile the tension that human beings have the capacity to cause much harm and pain even while they have also done much good for the church.”

From 2012 to 2015, Rempel continued his affiliation with Grebel as director of the Toronto Mennonite Theological Centre, a program administered by the college. Later, he became a senior fellow at the centre, a role Grebel has now asked him to step down from.

In a joint news release, MC Canada, MC U.S.A. and Mennonite World Conference (MWC) responded to the news saying, “As church bodies with which Rempel has worked closely over his career . . . we grieve for the victim-survivors harmed by Rempel’s actions and honour their courage in coming forward.” The statement continues, “We uphold [MC Eastern Canada’s] decision to take decisive and public action in this situation and to walk alongside victim-survivors on the path of healing and wholeness.”

Throughout the 1990s, Rempel served as Mennonite Central Committee’s liaison to the United Nations in New York City and served as pastor of the Manhattan Mennonite Fellowship there.

From 2003 to 2012, he served as a professor at Anabaptist Mennonite Biblical Seminary, teaching theology and Anabaptist studies. Representing MWC from 2012 to 2017, Rempel participated in an ecumenical dialogue on baptism with representatives of the Roman Catholic Church and the Lutheran World Federation.

Rempel wrote on theological topics for academic and church publications. He was on the editorial committee for Hymnal: A Worship Book and was editor of the Minister’s Manual used by MC Canada and MC U.S.A. Rempel was also among the editors of Take Our Moments and Our Days, an Anabaptist prayer and worship resource.

Because he was involved in writing and editing materials published by MennoMedia, executive director Amy Gingerich acknowledged that this revocation of credentials raises complicated questions: The church has serious concerns about using material written by someone who has perpetrated sexual violence, like disgraced Catholic songwriter David Haas. But how is that concern expressed given that Rempel only worked within a collaborative team in some of those publications? MennoMedia acknowledged that he had “no direct role in making any final decisions about the contents” of the new Voices Together hymnal.

All the church bodies responding to this news expressed grief and concern for the victim-survivors and for the wider church. MC Eastern Canada stated: “We, as a faith community, must support paths that lead to healing and wholeness for all. As a regional church, we will do our best to walk alongside all those who are impacted.”

Both Grebel and MC Eastern Canada encourage any persons who have experienced misconduct of a credentialled leader to contact Marilyn Rudy-Froese, the regional church’s church leadership minister at mrudyfroese@mcec.ca, or Carizon Counselling Services, an agency appointed to receive confidential disclosures related to this matter, at 519-743-6333 or intaketeam@carizon.ca . The MC Eastern Canada website also offers resources on reporting sexual misconduct.

—Updated Oct. 28, 2020

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

Tags:

John D. Rempel, MC Eastern Canada, Mennonite Church Eastern Canada, ministerial sexual misconduct, sexual misconduct

Share this article:

22 Responses to “Credentials terminated for theologian-academic-pastor”

Tom Yoder Neufeld
23 October 2020
Credentials terminated for theologian-academic-pastor
I share deep sadness and grief over John Rempel’s sexual misconduct and the withdrawal of his ministerial credentials. It is a devastatingly costly and painful moment for those who came forward, for John, his family and friends, and the church he has served faithfully for decades. For church leaders and institutions to take a clear stand with those who have been harmed is entirely in keeping with Jesus, who identifies himself with the most vulnerable and who expresses unmitigated outrage at their being abused (Matthew 18:1-9). Following Jesus as disciples demands it.
I am just as convinced, however, that the church and its leaders need to stand with those who have done the harm, who have sinned—not to defend or diminish their behaviours, but to stand with them in patient, loving hope for full acknowledgement and true repentance, for the experience of forgiveness, and for restoration to full fellowship/koinonia. It means not only pledging to offer every assistance to those who have been harmed, but also to do everything possible to recover the offender from the wreckage of sin, shame and brokenness. While that is often viewed as the enemy of true justice, it goes to the very heart of what it means to be followers of the Jesus who incarnated himself in the vulnerable and gave his life for sinners (Romans 5). In the body of Christ we do not cancel each other.
On standing with the victims/survivors, the church and school statements on John Rempel’s discipline are strong and clear. On standing with the one who has offended, they are largely silent. If this concern is there in the hearts of those who have carried the awfully heavy burden of dealing with this tragic case, then I am deeply disheartened that we cannot find words or means to express such yearning for “healing and hope” for the one who has brought harm on others, and to offer the church’s resources and creative imagination to that end. That must be part of our repertoire if we truly wish to be a peace church. Following Jesus as disciples demands it.
Tom Yoder Neufeld
Waterloo, ON
Log in to Reply
walter bergen
23 October 2020
credentials terminated
thank-you T. Yoder-Neufeld for interjecting a word of grace. The public shaming of Brother Rempel for something done decades ago seems unnecessary. Does a life of faithful service count for nothing?
Log in to Reply
Rose Graber
24 October 2020
John Remple
It would be helpful for all pastors to hear a definition of what constitutes sexual misconduct and ministerial misconduct. Is a hug misconduct or a swat on the rear? (ie. Sports) What is included and what is not?
Secondly what is helpful about stripping credentials and banning institutional entrance? Are the accusers feeling unsafe? Are the authorities afraid he will misbehave again? Or is this just punishment?
Log in to Reply
1. Jacqueline Sookermany
  27 October 2020
  Consent!
  Sexual misconduct is being talked about WIDLY in the world, it should not be difficult for pastors, or anyone for that matter, to find this information and learn about informed consent. A good rule of thumb is to not touch anyone without their consent. Given that the allegations, which have been found to be credible, are regarding not just misconduct, but sexual misconduct, it is safe to assume that the victims felt sexually harassed; what that looks like is going to be individually based, but will be grounded in the fact that consent was not given.
  What is helpful about stripping credentials and institutional bans is that it prevents a predator from holding positions of power over people and is a symbolic gesture to show that he has lost any repute within the institutions he is barred from. Of COURSE his victims would feel unsafe, wouldn’t you? Of course there is worry he would do this again, the only reason he has admitted to wrong doing is because people were finally able to come forward after he harmed them! How can he be trusted after that? Not to mention the fact that his statements show no remorse for his actions and instead ask us to feel bad for him. Does that sound like someone who can be trusted to make better decisions or does it sound like someone who will be more clever about hiding their wrong doing in the the future?
  Log in to Reply
Carol Ann Weaver
24 October 2020
Credentials terminated for theologian-academic-pastor
John D. Rempel is a dear friend to me and countless others. He has mentored and inspired many. Now is a time for all of us to take stock of the culture we have created — one in which victims of his sexual misconduct have not felt safe to speak out for fear they would not be heard or believed. The pain of holding these experiences within, for all these 30-40 years, must have been almost unbearable. These are the people who need our empathy now, so that justice and mercy may continue to be brought forth. None of us are pure enough to throw the first stone, but all of us can help build a stronger community which can find better ways for accountability to take place and for healing to occur.
Log in to Reply
Marcus Shantz
25 October 2020
A response to Tom Yoder Neufeld
It will not be my practice to respond to every published comment that is made about the findings of misconduct against John D. Rempel. Given that Tom Yoder Neufeld is an emeritus faculty member at Conrad Grebel University College, I am obliged to publicly respond to his letter.
Firstly, I have personally received responses to Yoder-Neufeld’s comments from some of the survivors in this case. They unfortunately experienced the letter as shaming them for coming forward, and pressuring them to quickly forgive. I have communicated directly with Yoder-Neufeld about his letter. I believe that he regrets how his words were received, and that he did not intend to communicate these things.
For my part, I will state again that I am deeply grateful that the survivors came forward to share their experiences. They have helped our College and the wider community address painful truths. I know for a fact that some of the survivors continue to pray that God might forgive their offender, even if they cannot take that step personally. I think that is an extraordinary sign of their faith — and I think it’s more than enough to expect of them.
Secondly, Yoder-Neufeld’s letter states that the Church and the College have been “largely silent” in expressing concern for the offender in our public statements, and suggests that we have neglected values of mercy and forgiveness. This is untrue. The suggestion that we wish to “cancel” the offender is mere rhetoric that ignores what we actually said. The implication that we have not adequately applied “the church’s resources and creative imagination” towards forgiveness is uninformed by any direct knowledge of our lengthy experience in working on this painful matter to date.
My official statement calls on John’s community to continue supporting him, not to abandon or to shun him. I also invite prayers for “everyone involved.”
MCEC’s press release notes John’s service to the church, that he has done good things, and that he “was, and is, a… beloved pastor, professor and theologian.” It notes that “human beings have the capacity to cause much harm and pain even while they have also done much good…” It commits the church to “walk alongside all those who are impacted.”
Leah Reesor-Keller’s excellent companion piece, Waging Peace Against Ministerial Misconduct and Abuse (https://mcec.ca/article/10843-waging-peace-on-ministerial-misconduct-and-abuse), goes further. It states: “For you who have caused harm, whether intentionally or unintentionally, know that you are also a beloved child of God. We believe in a God of repentance and redemption.”
I share that belief. But belief in a forgiving God does not mean that we should rush to offer forgiveness instantly – much less pressure survivors to forgive. As our community begins the long process of coming to grips with this trauma, I recommend reading Ecclesiastes: “To everything there is a season.” There is a time and a place for everything. The day may come when we can talk of forgiveness, but now is not that time. Now is the time to confront painful truths. And while I respect everyone’s right to speak out, this might also be a time to more carefully consider the impact of our words, and to listen well.
Marcus Shantz
President, Conrad Grebel University College
—Updated Oct. 26, 2020
Log in to Reply
1. Jacqueline Sookermany
  27 October 2020
  Thank you!
  I SO appreciate the last paragraph of your response. There is a time for forgiveness but we cannot force it on victims/survivors, nor is it our place to offer forgiveness on their behalf as a “community.” I believe all people who have committed harm deserve to be cared for, I have cared for many myself, but that care can be private and is not the job of victims/survivors nor the wider community that support them out of empathy for shared experience.
  The Church and faith based spaces have so often made “forgiveness” obligatory and through that action further silenced and harmed victims/survivors. I am truly so impressed by and thankful for this victim/survivor centred response from yourself and your institution!
  Log in to Reply
2. Mary Mae Schwartzentruber
  27 October 2020
  Thank you
  Marcus,
  your clarity and carefulness give me much reason to be grateful. You are carrying a heavy load. God bless you.
  Log in to Reply
3. Muriel Bechtel
  29 October 2020
  Marcus Shantz’s response
  Well said!
  Log in to Reply
Jeff Altaras
25 October 2020
John Rempel
I find it interesting that it is mostly men who are perpetrators, mostly men who speak out in defense of perpetrators and/or mostly men who remain silent when perpetrators are rooted out.
Both the Neufeld and Bergen comments are offensive and uninformed. Jesus was a practicing Jew who believed in justice — simply said: “the truth comes out.”
As a retired Ethics executive for the largest exporter in the world, I detect that the comments of both men come from a lack of understanding that when one joins an institution and is being paid, one is bound and subject to the ethics, values and by-laws of “the institution”. Conversely, the institution which receives cash for a product or service, has a responsibility to ensure the safety and well-being of all under its care.
Both Conrad Grebel and MCEC accept money from constituents, who are assured they and their families are safe and can grow intellectually and spiritually under the auspices of those institutions. Those institutions rely on the public and public trust to stay solvent, and are obligated to “act” when anyone violates the responsibilities of the institution, no matter when it happened. To not act, or to act and not disclose, leaves those who know what occurred or were victimized, with the impression that the institution does not care and did nothing. The institution is obligated to alert those who rely on them, that they take indiscretions seriously, and that they are doing their part to ensure the keeping of their promises of upholding the institution’s values. In addition, pastoral credentials are owned by the issuing institution, not the individual, and are subject to revocation when indiscretions are discovered.
Whether Rempel receives forgiveness is a private matter, not the responsibility of any institution he was part of.
Mr. Bergen’s comment about the institution’s “public shaming of brother Rempel”, exemplifies the problems that perpetuate such abuses. To say, “brother Rempel”, smells like a men’s club. It’s precisely the men’s club that has enabled abuse. Comments such as this show a complete lack of understanding of the issues of abuse of power and serve to ensure the club remains alive and well. In addition, the impact of sexual abuse has no time clock. Victims of sexual abuse suffer for their entire lives. When a pastor, church leader, theologian, or professor enters into the realm of committing sexual abuse, they do so at their own peril, they will be discovered, and their lives of “faithful service” will be forever tarnished.
Thank you MCEC and Conrad Grebel for seeking the right thing to do and taking action. Your actions build confidence in your institutions.
Jeff Altaras
Log in to Reply
Lisa Schirch
25 October 2020
Resist narratives that excuse abuses of power, rush forgiveness
1. Rempel’s friends and supporters can aid in the process of healing by resisting the temptation to craft narratives that excuse or justify the reports of Rempel’s harms made by multiple people involving a span of many years. Efforts to frame Rempel as the victim make healing more difficult.
2. In the past, Mennonite institutions have offered forgiveness to male leaders who have shown little remorse or understanding of the scope of harm they have caused. The path to healing starts first with truth-telling, accountability, and lament. The church cannot offer reconciliation or forgiveness on behalf of those harmed. Only those harmed by Rempel’s abuse of power can decide if and when they want to do that. They should not be pushed or rushed.
3. We must confess that we are a sexually illiterate church. Too many Mennonites wrongly conflate homosexuality with promiscuity and abuse and lack understanding of the research on sexual abuse. Some defend Rempel’s abuse by noting that the church’s homophobia created a situation where he could not keep his position of authority in the church and form healthy sexual relationships. While church persecution of LGBTQ+ people is widely documented, this is not an excuse for abuse. Abundant research has found sexual abuse is fundamentally an abuse of power. The focus should be on power, not sexuality. Many other LGBTQ+ Mennonites have embraced their sexuality in authentic, consensual relationships and have paid a steep price of exclusion from church institutions. Other LGBTQ+ people in the church are affected by Rempel’s choices.
Log in to Reply
Joel Driedger
26 October 2020
I am thankful for Toms
I am thankful for Toms comment above. It is right that the church make us hear the voices of the oppressed. We ARE the community of the oppressed.
And it is right that the church should offer paths of healing and forgiveness for all parties. Because we are a community of GRACE.
I am a friend of John and I am feeling with him because I know, that he not just regrets today what he has done in these former times, but already has took personal consequences decades ago.
Healing cannot be forced but comes as a gift. It is grace of God. So I hope for the healing of everybody and pray for good decisions and a reconciliation process.
Joel Driedger, Karlsruhe, Germany
Log in to Reply
Tim Wiebe-Neufeld
26 October 2020
Report on ministerial sexual misconduct by John D. Rempel
I am disappointed that this Canadian Mennonite’s report includes an extensive quote from John D. Rempel in which he emphasizes his own need for restorative justice rather than the harm he has caused. It is disheartening to then see this emphasis on grace for the offender echoed by some in their comments. In the triage of this moment the most important concern must be for the individuals harmed by the actions of a trusted church leader. While our faith calling to “healing and hope” includes those who have caused harm, that should not be the focus for today. Too often the rush to forgiveness has been used to diminish the weight of wrongdoing, ignore the pain caused, or even enable continued abuses of power.
There is grace offered in MC Eastern Canada’s statement above that “we, as a faith community, must support paths that lead to healing and wholeness for all”. This journey toward healing begins with a focus on the harm caused to victim-survivors and the grappling of a faith community with the realization of a trust that has been betrayed.
Log in to Reply
Cameron Altaras
26 October 2020
Ethics in our Mennonite Institutions
Thank you to the Canadian Mennonite for publishing this story and for providing a forum for discussion and response. Revelation of matters of abuse of power often catch us by surprise as they turn upside down the world as we have come to know it.
Now is the time for truth telling, confession, and accountability. From what we have come to learn, those who had been victimized by John Rempel have held his secret for years, even decades, thus protecting him. When they feel assured that Rempel has come to terms with the harm done in their lives, then they alone have the right to seek reconciliation.
Every human being deserves to be treated with dignity. To suggest, however, that it is those who have had their lives ruined by a man in a position of power over them are the ones who are now “ruining a good man’s life,” is deeply offensive, inappropriate, and causes further wounding. It is only in the very recent past that victims of sexual abuse have felt support in some parts of the Mennonite church, to garner the courage to come forward and break their silence. The rush to reconciliation and healing and support for Rempel and others like him who have perpetrated abuses, has been the standard response from far too many in leadership positions in our Mennonite institutions for much of our 500-year history.
Rempel’s support network needs to be there with him through this difficult time. However, their support is a disservice to Rempel, as well as the victims, if they join in the age-old tradition of victim-blaming, and rush to find healing for the offender. Now is the time for confession and lament and accountability. Rempel’s colleagues and friends who hope for transformation and healing can support him first in coming to terms with the scope of harms and abuses of power for which he is responsible.
Rempel was hired by and ordained by Mennonite Institutions. Mennonites have been reticent to articulate an Ethic of the Institution, which would compel us to articulate specifics regarding how to address ethical issues that arise within the institution. Hospitals, for example, have Medical Ethics Committees. We talk and write about interpersonal ethics, however, if we are going to have church institutions, then it behooves us to do some serious thinking about institutional ethics. Without such clarity at the institutional level, vague arguments posturing as theological conundrums sprinkled with Biblical references have allowed those who wish to abuse the power of their positions, to get away with abusing those who have placed their trust in them precisely because they are in such a position. We have work to do on this.
Log in to Reply
Myron Daniel Steinman
28 October 2020
New territory?
Did Jesus as recorded in the Gospels address the issues of sexual misconduct perpetrated by men against women? There is the story of the woman caught in adultery. There is the story of the woman at the well who had many husbands whom Jesus asked for a drink of water. Women had few rights in Jewish society? Do we follow Canadian society norms, or it better wrestle with this as the body of Christ?
Log in to Reply
Chris Barghout
28 October 2020
Without knowing the details,
Without knowing the details, it is not good that the Canadian Mennonite only quotes from the sexual predator and not (anonymously) quoting from the victims. Those with power get a voice even if they are sexual predators but not the victims. It is up to the victims to forgive and as I said I don’t know what happened. What I do know is that what I see is not a good environment this magazine only ads to the difficulty of those who experiences with sexual abuse stepping forward.
Log in to Reply
Myron D Steinman
29 October 2020
New Territory
Jesus, as presented in the Gospels, has very little to contribute to issues around sexuality?! Indeed the two examples I can remember are where two women are identified by Gospel writers as the perpetrators. Women had very few rights in this society, and is different from our Canadian society eh. I was saddened by two articles in recent months about past indiscretions/abuse committed by two men I knew personally or have had some contact. What ought to be the church’s response? May I propose a a gathering or assembly where we as the body of Christ can discern what path to take? The fate of these two men, and may I stress others, ought not to be decided by an elite of those in positions of power?
Log in to Reply
Mary Mae Schwartzentruber
29 October 2020
Credentials Terminated for theologian-academic-pastor
How emotionally and spiritually tumultuous: another revelation of clergy abuse of power. This pain is deepened when respondents publicly rush in to ‘support’ the perpetrator.
I am grateful for Rempel’s written acknowledgement of wrongdoing. He then lays claim to ‘40 years of celibacy’ (which is rather hard to prove). I don’t understand what that has to do with the use of power over vulnerable students. More ‘use of power’ questions can be raised. Rempel criticizes the church for “failing in justice and mercy……. without room for forgiveness, making amends, and working toward reconciliation.” Might this be an inappropriate claim to power and control, directing the church how to exercise discipline ‘correctly’? Might such a demand once again put his own needs (reconciliation) ahead of the needs of those who were victimized? A first step toward a redeemed future would include self-examination as to how he understands and exercises power.
Tom Yoder Neufeld’s words, “a devastatingly costly and painful moment for those who came forward,” leave me confused. I believe that there have been 40 years of devastating and costly moments for victims whose lives have been forever changed. I hope and pray that this is a moment of freedom from secrets and freedom to heal for those who came forward. Yoder Neufeld’s rush to criticize the church for not being clear about its intention for full restoration is deeply problematic. While hope for a renewed future is already evidenced in the church’s statements, who gets to define such Christlike perfection? Further, many of us are aware of how the church has protected abusers for a very long time while silencing those who were harmed. Our institutions are in early stages of “catch up” on appropriate responses to sexual abuse within the church. Tom’s call for a much stronger, immediate positivity toward those who are abusers seems exaggerated.
Walter Bergen hears Tom’s words as words of ‘grace.’ I hear them as words of judgement. I would not call the clear, careful, boundaried news releases a ‘public shaming’. Instead, I accept the policies that the church has created through many years of effort. That the behaviours occurred decades ago is deeply sad. ‘A life of faithful service’ can not negate the damage done to multiple students and their families. I am a survivor of clergy abuse; I know whereof I speak. And until the church is clear, consistent and teaching loudly about ‘the use and abuse of power,’ as well as exercising discipline on those who transgress – sexual abuse by clergy will not end.
Mary Mae Schwartzentruber, Kitchener, ON
Log in to Reply
1. Cameron Altaras
  29 October 2020
  Thank you, Mary Mae
  Thank you, Mary Mae, for your courageous and articulate response to this issue and to those who have spoken in ways that would have us not bring issues such as this to light. It’s time we change the course of history.
  #MeToo #ChurchToo
  Log in to Reply
David & Kathy Waltner-Toews
30 October 2020
Credentials Terminated
Re: the removal of John Rempel’s credentials
Thank you to the Canadian Mennonite for providing a forum for this important discussion.
One of us (Kathy) has worked for many decades as a therapist with both accusers and accused in cases of sexual and physical misconduct and abuse. The other of us (David), has worked for decades on how one communicates complex and serious issues to the general public. We have serious concerns on both counts with how Rempel’s case has been handled.
The official announcement of Rempel’s credentials implies that the inappropriate behaviour has been occurring over a period of decades up to and including the present time. The fact that several of the respondents refer to the accused as a “sexual predator” would confirm that this interpretation is probably intended. Hence the shunning from campus and removal of credentials which are apparently enabling his continued alleged behaviour. Nevertheless, Rempel was an adjunct professor between 1973 to 1989, after which he moved to the United States. There is no indication that Grebel and MCEC decisions were based on anything other than events that happened more than 30 years ago, or that any places where Rempel worked in the subsequent decades were consulted.
Working with people in situations of possible abuse is fraught with challenges. There has been a culture of silence–not only in churches, but in other large institutions–around issues of abuse of power, sexual abuse, and sexuality in general. The church has most often been a reluctant and resistant follower in making changes to create safe spaces for those who have been abused or hurt. Having said this, it is also true that the accusers are not always right. There is a huge body of psychological and counselling evidence about the malleability of memory, and the problems of using “credible” (to use MCEC’s term) but uncorroborated information to cast firm judgements. Problems of memory have ranged from, say, neurologist Oliver Sacks clearly remembering events from his youth which were not his own, to cases of people who have been incarcerated for crimes, including sexual assault and murder to which they had confessed but later, after careful investigations, were found not to have committed.
How then to proceed? In the first place, everyone needs assurance that the process is very clear and fair, has been followed carefully and to the letter, and that those involved in the process have the credentials required to investigate such cases. Without such guiderails along the narrow path through this “slough of despond” there is a danger that one could fall off either side into a fist-fight of mutual accusations and conspiracy theories. This is certainly not in the interests of either the accusers or the accused.
Abuses of power, especially sexual abuses, cannot be treated as pastoral concerns. Compassion, empathy and piety are important in dealing with accused and accusers after investigation and judgement; they are less relevant in gathering that evidence. In Rempel’s case, according to the public reports, a committee of MCEC (people with pastoral credentials) “held hearings” and, on the basis of the credibility of the accusations, made the judgement. We would argue that pastoral and congregational leadership credentials are exactly the wrong ones to have for such a committee. We are rightly suspicious when police are called to investigate police misconduct. On the one hand, we suspect that they will draw conclusions that place them in the best light (eg that was a bad apple; the rest of us are righteous). On the other hand people in those leadership positions are being held to much higher behavioural standards than anyone in the church at large, and would have a vested interest in being seen to take accusers unquestioningly at their word, and then to mete out the severest possible punishments in order not to be seen to be protecting their own. A committee with no vested interests and with proper investigative and psycho-therapeutic credentials would be more appropriate.
We are also aware that serious inappropriate touching, inappropriate comments, misunderstandings, assaults and rape are often conflated in the public mind. This, combined with a misguided investigation process, does a serious disservice to those who have been seriously hurt and/or silenced; it would hinder those who have been seriously hurt from coming forward, while encouraging those with lesser concerns to give voice to them. All of these concerns suggest that the processes of investigation, and the way the findings of those investigations are communicated publicly, require skills and understanding that were not apparent in Rempel’s case.
Finally, we are aware that some church institutions, in response to the MCEC and CGC decisions, are reconsidering the legitimacy of Rempel’s publications and theological contributions to church life and thought. This reckless conflating of personal behaviour with contributions to our common life punishes not only the accused, but the church itself and the wider Christian community. The logical outcome of such actions would result in rejecting the works of, for instance, Gandhi (because he slept naked with his grand-niece) and, perhaps more problematically, Saint Paul (for his early active complicity in the persecution and murder of early Christians). Do we really want to go down that road?
David and Kathy Waltner-Toews
Kitchener, Ontario
Log in to Reply
Mervin (Merv) Eugne Horst
30 October 2020
John D Rempel’s Theology of the Table and my prayers
I am a charter member of Manhattan Mennonite Fellowship in New York, NY where John D. Rempel was our charter pastor. I was on the pastoral search committee which chose Rempel. You see that I have a lot of skin in this game. I moved to Menno House in October 1984 after graduating from Goshen College with a major in Mennonite History and German. (Rempel and I speak in German whenever we can and I have multiple books in my collection inscribed to me in Rempel’s unique Handschrift!) At Menno House, I lived in the room above which Rempel formed the MMC Liaison Office ten years later. I have set my hand to the plow and have not turned back. Rempel is very strong in his theology of gathering around the Table in fellowship and The Lord’s Supper.
Recently, I have learned of the poem “Perhaps the World Ends here” by Joy Harjo. This poem begins “The world begins at a kitchen table.” I regularly use the kitchen table that my grandparents Gladys and Abner Zimmerman received as a gift in April 1938 upon their marriage three times or more a day.
I have another table, the original Communion Table from Manhattan Mennonite Fellowship that fell apart due to our Fellowship having to move it around too much. RempeI had this table contructed and I could not stand to allow this table to be thrown away. It awaits repair. On the underside of this table every day I see the words “Mennonite Church” which Rempel stubbornly wrote because he did not cherish the name “Fellowship.”
And finally, around another table in Rempel’s fifth floor walk-up some time around 1998, I told my then pastor Rempel the realization after much soul searching that I am gay. Since then as a member of the Mennonite LGBTQ+ community, I have felt nothing but genuine support from Rempel.
Harjo’s poem continues to be appropriate as she concludes and are very appropriate for the many facets of our situation:
“Wars have begun and ended at this table. It is a place to hide in the shadow of terror. A place to celebrate the terrible victory.
We have given birth on this table, and have prepared our parents for burial here.
At this table we sing with joy, with sorrow. We pray of suffering and remorse. We give thanks.
Perhaps the world will end at the kitchen table, while we are laughing and crying, eating of the last sweet bite.”
In my personal devotions yesterday, I came across Number 693 in Hymnal: A Worship Book translated by Rempel the words of Balthasar Hubmaier–and forgive the patriarchy of the 1500’s–, “Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you. I am not worthy to be called your child because I have not carried out your will. But speak a word of comfort and my soul shall be healed. God, be merciful to me a sinner. AMEN”
I trust that we will not need to wait for the Heavenly Banquet before we all with our many pains, angers and wishes for reconciliation are granted. Would there be ways for this to happen between Rempel, those against misconduct was exacted, The Mennonite Institutions which teach Peace and Reconciliation and the Mennonite Institutions to which Rempel has submitted himself? Many of us at Manhattan Mennonite Fellowship are seeking for ways to create a safe space for all—the abused as well as those whom have caused that harm. We welcome ways to keep Christ at the center of this very complicated situation. I regularly name those on the many sides of this situation by name in the Prayer services in which I have been privileged to make part of my spiritual practice from my living room as a result of COVID-19. As my grandmother would close her letters to me “Meeting you at the Throne of Grace.”
Merv Horst
New York, NY
Log in to Reply
Ginny Hostetler
2 November 2020
From the editor
The online comments for this article are now closed. If you wish to respond, send a short letter (maximum of 300 words, addressing the topic, not individuals) to letters@canadianmennonite.org. It will be considered for inclusion in the Readers Write section of the print edition. –Virginia A. Hostetler, Executive Editor
Log in to Reply