Covenant and law: A matter of relationship

July 20, 2016 | Focus On | Volume 20 Issue 15
Deborah Froese | Mennonite Church Canada

Over two days at Mennonite Church Canada’s Assembly 2016, “God~Faith~People,” keynote speaker Safwat Marzouk addressed the topic of covenant that was central to the theme text, Jeremiah 31:33.

During the July 7 worship service, he explained that covenant is an agreement of mutual obligation, in which each party has the ability and responsibility to uphold his or her side.

The assistant professor of Old Testament/Hebrew Bible at Anabaptist Mennonite Biblical Seminary in Elkhart, Ind., said the idea of covenants and law may make people feel uncomfortable and uncertain about their ability to uphold them. He suggested that they might have an easier time of it if they looked at the intertwining threads of God’s law and the story of God’s people together.

Marzouk said that God’s faithfulness and love can be seen through the diversity of God’s laws, and how these laws were formulated and reformulated over a long period of time. They moved from conditional laws, where people were required to comply or suffer the consequences, to unconditional laws, which, instead of being inscribed on a tablet of stone, God chose to write on the hearts of God’s people.

“What does it mean for us as a discerning church to think of God and the laws as being framed in a relational way, rather than demanding [our] way? God is engaging and responding to human needs,” he said.

On the following day, Marzouk told delegates at a plenary session that the Bible uses the same word for covenant regardless of whether that agreement is between God and God’s people, or between people. It’s the same word used in the covenant between God and Noah, between Abraham and his allies, and between Isaac and the Philistines.

God isn’t calling people into a monocultural or melting-pot relationship, he said, and God isn’t calling them into a multicultural relationship in which cultures are allowed to exist side by side. Those relationships aren’t reflective of the kingdom of God, Marzouk said. God is calling people to intercultural relationships, where they truly learn and grow from each other.

“We walk our spiritual journeys in different ways and different paths, and sometimes our spirituality has a specific accent to it or emphasis that we rely on, and sometimes we need to be challenged by the other voice or the other side of spirituality that is present in the biblical text,” he said, noting that the church is called by the Spirit to cultivate a covenantal community that fosters a just diversity, where differences are received as a gift, not a threat.

He offered five theological principles to guide covenantal relationships:

  • The church is God’s project. Acts 10 reveals dramatic ethnic, religious, political and economic differences between Peter, Jesus’ disciple, and Cornelius, the gentile Roman soldier. While these disparities might render a relationship between them impossible, God makes it clear to Peter that the relationship is permitted—as is the food Cornelius offers. When Peter obeys God, God pours the Holy Spirit over the gentiles.
  • The need is mutual. When the belief that God is God permeates human worship and relationships, people find value not in the privilege they try to protect, but in joining God in God’s mission of peace and justice.
  • Conversion is mutual. In Acts 10, Peter’s theology regarding what was “clean” and “unclean” shifted as a result of his encounter with Cornelius, and his eyes were opened to God’s capacity for diversity. At the same time, Cornelius encountered God.
  • Fellowship is vital. It allows people to walk in each other’s lives. “In order to move forward, the sharing of stories has to be a part of our journey,” he said. “We share stories in order for the Spirit of God to empower the church to move from pain, shame, oppression, into the realm of the kingdom of God.”
  • Healthy boundaries are necessary. In an intercultural covenantal church, “members aren’t fixated on their own identities, but they are sensitive to the new thing that the Spirit is creating when different identities worship together, fellowship together and serve together,” Marzouk said.

Marzouk’s teaching generated considerable interaction on Twitter. Tim Wenger wrote that “Acts 10 invites us to reconsider the boundaries we construct to protect ourselves.” Others were struck by the big picture of Marzouk’s teaching; Michael Pahl simply shared that “@safwatmarzouk is bringin’ it.”

See more on Assembly 2016:

Taking down our harps (editorial)
Hope through lament and loss (overview)
Ready for God’s response? (focus on speaker Cindy Wallace)
The Mennonite Church Canada Assembly 2016 page has links to reports, videos, news sheets and more.

Share this page: Twitter Instagram

Add new comment

Canadian Mennonite invites comments and encourages constructive discussion about our content. Actual full names (first and last) are required. Comments are moderated and may be edited. They will not appear online until approved and will be posted during business hours. Some comments may be reproduced in print.