A century-and-a-half after the Mennonite Brethren (MB) Church and General Conference (GC) Mennonite Church divided, Canadian Mennonite University (CMU) held a “Celebrating 150 Years” event on June 5, in an effort to listen to the stories of each denomination and learn from them.
Sheila Klassen-Wiebe, associate professor of biblical and theological studies, believes that both faithfulness and sinfulness characterized the GCs (now Mennonite Church Canada) and the MBs at their division in 1860 and in the years following. The two conferences were faithful at their separation because they saw their differences and separation as “matters crucial to their faith,” she said.
However, their actions—that were probably done out of faith—were “marred by sinful influences, like mistrust, desire for power and harsh words,” she said, which tainted this likely positive split.
As a result, even today the older generations of MBs and GCs struggle with their identity, feelings of abandonment, and the ramifications of the distance and disapproval on both sides. This is because, between 60 and 80 years ago, MBs and GCs were excommunicated for marrying into each other’s conferences, and GC members also had to be rebaptized if they wanted to join an MB church.
A common theme among CMU professors who spoke at the conference was that they were taught that the opposite conference was sinful or strange.
Ten years after the amalgamation of Concord College, Mennonite Brethren Bible College and Canadian Mennonite Bible College to form CMU, there remains a strong GC dominance. In some people’s minds, the name “Canadian Mennonite University” gives the impression that it is mainly GC, although it was chosen to be inclusive of both conferences and to be descriptive of its geographical setting.
Irma Fast Dueck, an associate professor of practical theology, said “it felt like abandonment” when the colleges joined with an apparent GC emphasis.
Although intended to celebrate the two conferences and to facilitate learning about one another, “Celebrating 150 Years” also ended up being a time of revelation.
Dan Epp-Tiessen, an associate professor of the Bible and a faculty member that is involved in hiring new professors, said that, more often than not, instructors who apply are GCs. CMU would be very interested in hiring people from the MB tradition, he said; however, they tend not apply for positions. “I believe we would be stronger if we had more of an MB ethos. One culture still predominates here [at CMU],” he said.
While “Celebrating 150 Years” aimed at closing the MB-GC divide, it was made apparent that younger generations of MBs and GCs do not perceive such a great division among one another.
Four graduates spoke on a panel about their experiences with the two traditions: Michael Bueckert and Jessica Dyck from the GC tradition, and Andrea Dick and Tim Rempel from the MB tradition.
For Dick, before coming to CMU there was no divide among her GC and MB friends. “We were friends. We had relationships with Jesus Christ, and that was it,” she said.
After coming to CMU, Dyck said her GC background “did not affect the people I became friends with,” and any differences between the two conferences were made known in a joking manner.
Being at CMU taught Bueckert that any rivers of difference “are not too deep to cross,” he said.
According to Rempel, the divides are going away and the younger generations are celebrating “otherness.”
There may be some difference between MBs and the GCs, but there are also intersections. Where there are differences, “we can learn from one another,” CMU president Gerald Gerbrandt said.