Readers Write: March 2025



Solar story missed the mark
I was looking forward to reading the story in the December issue about Rockway Mennonite Collegiate’s solar array. But after reading the story, something didn’t feel right.
Although the article was entitled “Rockway solar project generates imperfect hope,” I think it would have more appropriately been titled, “Solar project generates hope for staff and students, but they are uninformed of where the materials for the panels come from.”
It is quite clear that solar energy production, like all energy production systems, has environmental impacts, but to provide balanced reporting, the article should have discussed why Rockway was installing the panels in the first place, which was to generate energy from the sun rather than burn fossil fuels to produce electricity.
For new electricity generation in Ontario, solar energy generally replaces burning more natural gas. Since the story didn’t offer the downside of the fossil fuel that Rockway is replacing with their panels, here are a few facts.
According to the federal government website, in Canada, the process of mining and producing oil and gas is responsible for 31 per cent of national carbon pollution. Air pollution. caused in part by the burning of fossil fuels, is responsible for over 15,000 premature deaths annually in Canada.
I believe that Rockway and students should be congratulated on their project. I think that the Canadian Mennonite unintentionally missed the mark on this story, coming across somewhat cynical of a very worthwhile project.
But please, keep positive stories on the environment coming!

– Jay Reesor, Waterloo, Ontario
(First Mennonite Church, Kitchener)

Note: Our coverage was intentional (though readers are, of course, welcome to question it). We want to report on alternative projects and also encourage dialogue between various viewpoints expressed in the magazine over time.
Since we have published two pieces in the past couple of years that question perpetual economic growth which necessitates perpetual increase in energy demand and supply, we felt there would be value in bringing that perspective into the mix.
New alternative energy projects do two things: 1) displace “dirtier” forms of energy; and 2) fuel ever-growing energy consumption. We have no doubt that high school students can grapple creatively with the tension between these truths.
Whether we raised the tension in the best way or place is open to debate.
– Eds.



Leave a Reply