Hermeneutic of hope

Error message

Warning: Creating default object from empty value in load_weighted_ads() (line 1115 of /home/canadia/public_html/sites/all/modules/weighted_ads/weighted_ads.module).

Family Ties

November 15, 2017
Melissa Miller
Melissa Miller

Last weekend, I attended a wedding. The bride and groom asked their guests to register by highlighting their favourite verse in a Bible that they will carry into their new, shared life. A few days later, I sat beside my mother’s hospital bed and read to her from Psalm 121. Her long life has been lived in the shadow of mountains, and her faith has been shaped by the God who is more steadfast and enduring than mountains. At the wedding and the hospital, I marvelled at the power of Scripture to inspire, strengthen and guide. I give thanks for the Bible.

In a previous column (Oct. 23, page 8), I wrote about the “respectful critique” or “hermeneutic of suspicion” that I bring to the sacred Scriptures. I am grateful for readers who have responded, adding to what is a rich conversation. In this column, I offer a balancing principle, for I also come to Scripture with a hermeneutic of hope.

First, though, I need to reiterate that my primary hermeneutic is that of Jesus. When I look at a scripture, when I discuss it with others, when I prepare to preach, I ask, “How does this scripture look through ‘the lens of Jesus’?” I was encouraged by the thoughtful guidance on biblical interpretation provided by our national church. Specifically I am referring to Being a Faithful Church 4 (available online at commonword.ca). Under a title of “Using the Bible in helpful and unhelpful ways,” one principle declares: “The life, teaching, death and resurrection of Jesus are central, and serve as the critical lens of interpretation that helps us understand all of Scripture.” Amen!

In the same document, we are cautioned to avoid “generalizations without having immersed ourselves in particular texts.” Similarly, “We should not assume that our own context is either static or normative when interpreting the Bible . . . we live in a changing context, and our understandings are partial.” Truly my context is not static. Certainly the norms for a 21st-century Canadian woman are different from the norms of biblical times, and my understandings are partial.

These reflections grew from questions about the Bible’s helpfulness in ethical decisions today. These are not abstract questions. For example, some 2,000 Canadians have elected for medically assisted death in the last two years. Did any of them seek and find support for their actions in the Bible, as they endured such suffering? When family members are faced with complex decisions about medical procedures to prolong the life—or end the misery—of their loved one, can they find direction in the Bible?

Does the Bible have anything to say about the conditions under which a person might seek to end a pregnancy? Or which infertility treatments to seek? Do we find guidance when selecting which methods of birth control we are to use, if any? Which would we avoid for religious reasons? In short, as robust, precious and sacred as we find the Bible to be, we encounter limitations in using it as the sole resource for some ethical decisions.

Nevertheless, we have hope. With the model of Jesus—known in the gospels and living among us today—we can approach Scripture hopefully. Surely hope was operating as the wedding guests lined up and carefully selected a Bible verse. Surely hope was operating as I saw my ailing mother soothed by the words of Scripture that testify to a faithful God. I pray that we may continue to wrestle with the Bible, to listen for God’s voice in the voice of the other, and to be open to the treasures found in the Bible’s rich and varied textures.

Melissa Miller (familyties@mymts.net) has a passion for helping people develop healthy, vibrant relationships with God, self and others.

Melissa Miller

Comments

Melissa, once again I simply cannot allow your article to go unchallenged. Buried beneath the pseudo-spiritual language is another invitation to question the word of God. You say, "In short, as robust, precious and sacred as we find the Bible to be, we encounter limitations in using it as the sole resource for some ethical decisions."

Really? Are you seriously telling us that the Bible alone is insufficient for the ethical issues of modern humanity? That is pure error. If so, I'm wondering what other sources you might point us to in helping us to discern our present times. Perhaps post-modern cultural influences, such as Feminism and Liberation Theology as you suggested in your last column?

On the contrary, historical Mennonite faith has always held to the authority and trustworthiness of scripture. Article #4 of our Confession of Faith states:

"We acknowledge the Scripture as the authoritative source and standard for preaching and teaching about faith and life, for distinguishing truth from error, for discerning between good and evil, and for guiding prayer and worship. Other claims on our understanding of Christian faith and life, such as tradition, culture, experience, reason, and political powers, need to be tested and corrected by the light of Holy Scripture."

I'm wondering where exactly you receive your authority to steer us in another direction. The inherent problem in your hermeneutical approach continues to be that you seem to look to culture to interpret the Bible. This is folly since human culture is ever-changing. Instead, the historical confession of the Church for 2000 years has been that God's word is unchanging, and therefore it interprets culture (not vice-versa). This is what a hermeneutic of Jesus entails. As the Word/Logos made flesh, Jesus is perfectly capable and qualified to instruct us through His unchanging biblical message through His Spirit.

A well-thought-out and inspiring article. Thanks Melissa.

Add new comment