Archive for the 'All Authors' Category

An Ocean Prayer

We watched for two and half hours for whales off the coast of Vir­ginia, but saw only the awe­some cre­ation of sea, sky, birds, and the glow of wind on my face. A breath of ocean air. A prayer.

391 (God’s Dirt)

I was talk­ing to the Youth about this pas­sage the other day, and I vocal­ized how incred­i­ble I thought God’s poetry skills were. He rips into Job with a series of pas­sion­ate poems, almost raps. I’ve always found the last few chap­ters in Job to be some of the most cap­ti­vat­ing writ­ing in the entire Bible. It reminds me that we are small, minute, and just a part of a much big­ger picture.

Job sat back and apol­o­gized for his com­ments after God’s speech. We could, in fact, answer a lot of the ques­tions that God lobbed at Job. Actu­ally, there are peo­ple who could answer them quite well. But I love the fact that the entire rant is “do you know…?” type of ques­tions. Let me explain why I find this so fas­ci­nat­ing. I’m reminded of the joke…

A sci­en­tist dies and meets God. “Oh, it’s you,” he says. “We don’t need you any­more.” “What do you mean?” God asks. “Well, mod­ern sci­ence has done every­thing. We can cre­ate our own ele­ments, genet­i­cally alter our food so it lasts longer than yours did, we can even cre­ate life!” “Really?” laughs God, “I’d like to see that.” “Sure, here, just give me a minute,” the sci­en­tist bends down and begins scoop­ing dirt together into a clump. “Wait a sec­ond,” says God. “Get your own dirt.”

We can sit here and believe we’ve achieved a lot — after all, we can answer God’s ques­tions in Job with a resound­ing YES. But can we dupli­cate any­thing he does? We can answer that with a yes, maybe not quite as resound­ing. But it comes down to the fact that we are still using God’s tools. We can clone, yes, but we’re still using God’s hand­i­work, the mir­a­cle of DNA. It is, after all, God’s dirt.

Tak­ing Heart,

Paul Loewen

Worth Living For—Worth Dying For

Gene Stoltz­fus blog: http://peaceprobe.wordpress.com

This is Gene Stoltzfus’s last essay, com­pleted on Wednes­day, March 10, 2010, just before he headed out on his beloved motor-assisted bicy­cle on the first spring day of the year. He picked up his U.S. mail in Inter­na­tional Falls, MN. Then on his return jour­ney, less than a kilo­me­ter from home in Ft. Frances, ON, his heart stopped. Please feel free to leave com­ments after this post on his blogsite: http://peaceprobe.wordpress.com. For more back­ground on Gene’s life and updates on his memo­r­ial ser­vices, see: http://www.cpt.org .
Gene Stoltz­fus, 1940–2010, Pre­sente!

–Phil Stoltz­fus, Gene’s nephew
–Dorothy Friesen, Gene’s wife

I have talked to sur­vivors of mil­i­tary inter­ro­ga­tion around the world who at some point thought they would not live for another day. I never write about it in the U.S. and Canada because it seems so unbe­liev­able and out of place in a world of san­i­tized shop­ping malls and super high­ways. When I retell their sto­ries I notice that peo­ple here fid­get. But inter­ro­ga­tion processes are one way in which mar­tyrs are cre­ated. Mar­tyrs in the orig­i­nal sense are “wit­nesses to the truth,” with a deep com­mit­ment of con­science that sus­tains them through moments of cru­elty and abuse.

Some peo­ple are killed dur­ing inter­ro­ga­tion. They never get to tell the story them­selves. So I have learned to lis­ten to those who nar­rowly avoid interrogation’s brush with death. This might be the time that you will pre­fer not to read on. But if you stop here you will skip over an impor­tant part of liv­ing and dying that stretches around the world and touches the entire human family.

I spent two hours in Iraq talk­ing to a 22-year-old stu­dent who was arrested in a house raid along with two of his broth­ers. Until the time of his cap­ture he was rel­a­tively unin­volved with any­thing polit­i­cal, not an unusual story in the Iraq of 2003. After his cap­ture by Amer­i­can mil­i­tary per­son­nel he was not allowed to sleep for two days. After 48 hours the Amer­i­can GIs told him that he would be killed unless he told them where Sad­dam Hus­sein was hid­ing. He was con­tin­u­ously blind­folded. He was told that his brother, taken into cus­tody at the same time, was just now being shot. In the dis­tance he could hear a gun being fired. If he didn’t want to die, he must tell all. Then nearby he heard a gun being cocked and felt a revolver touch­ing his head. He expected to die. There was more shout­ing from the sol­diers and then silence.

I believed I would die,” he told me. “And then after a long wait I felt my hand to be sure I was still alive.” His blind­fold was tem­porar­ily removed and then he was marched off to one of Iraq’s prison camps where he met oth­ers who expe­ri­enced sim­i­lar beat­ings and moments of ter­ror. He was released three months later because of per­sis­tent out­side inter­ven­tion – an advan­tage that many dis­ap­peared peo­ple do not have.

My time with him left me exhausted and jolted me to won­der how I would respond to inter­ro­ga­tion. Would I make up a story? Would I lie? Would some­thing I say impli­cate oth­ers? Would I respond with anger or phys­i­cal strug­gle? Would I go qui­etly to my death as some mar­tyrs are reported to have done? Would any­one know how I died?

After my talk with the unlikely mar­tyr, the con­nec­tion of this Mus­lim stu­dent to my own ances­tors in 16th-century Europe flut­tered in my mind. Did the sto­ries I read in my youth about the Anabap­tist mar­tyrs pre­pare me for this? Death by burn­ing or drown­ing is now lit­tle prac­ticed, but cur­rent author­i­ties still believe that truth can be accessed by means of bru­tal­ity. The pat­tern of tor­ture used for their inter­ro­ga­tion blended now with the peo­ple I was meet­ing. The Anabap­tist sto­ries recorded in the Mar­tyrs Mir­ror (sub­ti­tled “The Bloody The­atre of the Anabap­tists or Defense­less Chris­tians who suf­fered and were slain from the time of Christ until the year AD 1660”) are part of the con­tin­u­ous tapes­try of state-sponsored cru­elty reach­ing to our very own day.

In the late 1970s I worked in the Philip­pines. One day I was invited to meet a pas­tor and for­mer polit­i­cal pris­oner. The Mar­cos dic­ta­tor­ship had sent its mil­i­tary and para­mil­i­tary to his com­mu­nity and their tac­tics were designed to con­trol pop­u­lar dis­con­tent through cru­elty, ter­ror, dom­i­na­tion, killing and con­fis­ca­tion of prop­erty. The pas­tor felt bound by his con­vic­tions to do what was pos­si­ble to pro­tect the peo­ple of his church. He was arrested and inter­ro­gated for weeks. His body was spent. Finally he was encased in a blind­fold and told he would be killed. He felt the bar­rel of a revolver that touched the tem­ple of his head and rested there for a time while his inter­roga­tor demanded that he give names of the peo­ple with whom he worked. “I was silent because I couldn’t think any more,” he told me.

Were you afraid you would endan­ger oth­ers?” I asked. “Of course I was wor­ried that what I said would impli­cate oth­ers but when the gun was put to my head I just expected to die. I couldn’t think of any­thing to say. I even thought about being a pas­tor but that didn’t seem very impor­tant in the moment. I was ready to die. I just told them to get it over with. Dur­ing those days I thought about the mar­tyrs. The inter­roga­tor didn’t pull the trig­ger. I don’t know why.”

I felt my gut twitch after the pas­tor described the near-death moment. Was there any­thing I could say or do? Any­thing heal­ing? Any­thing per­sonal? The pas­tor, like the Iraqi stu­dent 25 years later, only requested that I tell the world what hap­pened to him. That was enough.

Accounts like these sto­ries of peo­ple liv­ing on bor­rowed time reach back cen­turies to pre-Roman times and show me that the impulse to dom­i­na­tion is still alive in our as-yet-uncivilized rep­til­ian brain stem. In our time the word “mar­tyr” has mor­phed from its root mean­ing of “wit­ness to the truth” to a descrip­tion of some­one who dies for his or her beliefs. The Greeks and early Chris­tians who used the term under­stood death to be a pos­si­ble out­come of the path towards truth and light. Even­tu­ally “mar­tyr” referred exclu­sively to those who died for their belief. Those who began as wit­nesses to truth became mar­tyrs at the time of death. For the Mus­lim, sha­hada (mar­tyr­dom) also springs from the inter­nal strug­gle that results in the wit­ness to truth. Both reli­gious tra­di­tions have departed from the core under­stand­ing of mar­tyr­dom in times of polit­i­cal con­flict and triumphalism.

From where did my child­hood curios­ity arise to steal into my father’s study to read about the mar­tyrs? Those draw­ings of tor­ture and burn­ing bod­ies awak­ened won­der within me. In one of my early return jour­neys to North Amer­ica from the lands of tor­ture – before I under­stood that tor­ture tech­niques had their home here – I was intro­duced to a new psy­cho­log­i­cal dis­ease called the mar­tyr com­plex — seek­ing per­se­cu­tion to ful­fill an inward need. Had I been the unwit­ting recip­i­ent of this dis­ease? Or was the use of the term “mar­tyr com­plex” the work of a psy­chol­o­gist who had never met a tor­ture vic­tim or known the hon­ored path to wit­ness prac­ticed by martyrs?

Church build­ings pay trib­ute to mar­tyrs, includ­ing long-forgotten sol­diers who died in dis­tant lands to pro­tect the nation or empire. Their deeds are cel­e­brated and inter­wo­ven with patri­o­tism. I have vis­ited churches in the Nether­lands, the birth­place of Anabap­tist mar­tyrs, where they place the Mar­tyrs Mir­ror on their altars before the ser­vice of wor­ship and return it to a locked closet after the ser­vice. I once inquired about the influ­ence of the book of mar­tyrs in the life of wor­shipers and was told that, “Most of us have no idea about the sto­ries in that book. It’s from another time.”

Why are sol­diers and inter­roga­tors still trained in the craft of tor­ture? Can moral out­rage and attempts to pro­tect the pris­oner change things? Why do Chris­t­ian cru­saders or Mus­lim sui­cide bombers slip into pat­terns of dom­i­na­tion that kill and destroy in a man­ner that can­not pos­si­bly reveal truth? Can respect for and ven­er­a­tion of mar­tyrs draw us closer to the truth when the pat­terns of our lives are so remote from the authen­tic truth-seeking rep­re­sented in martyrs?

Gen­uine mar­tyrs appear when peo­ple believe that their wit­ness on earth is con­nected to the whole of the uni­verse. Mar­tyrs are not inclined to draw atten­tion to them­selves, but their path can draw peo­ple to the glory and faith of a vision. Mar­tyrs have all the foibles of the rest of us. Some may not deserve the label. In our human fam­ily great move­ments that push us to tran­scend bound­aries with visions of hope pro­duce mar­tyrs. But orga­ni­za­tions and move­ments become emas­cu­lated and inef­fec­tual when they pro­tect them­selves too much from the risk of bold wit­ness. On the other hand, they also under­cut them­selves when they slide into vio­lence against oth­ers in order to try to con­trol the out­come of their vision. We have the chal­lenge of incar­nat­ing a blend of vul­ner­a­bil­ity and boldness.

The test of mar­tyr­dom is whether that par­tic­u­lar wit­ness to the truth helps to sup­port and sus­tain the community’s com­mit­ment to a full-bodied vision of peace and jus­tice. The mar­tyrs are present with us and may be more pow­er­ful for their wit­ness in death than they ever could have been in life.

Beautiful Judgement

Scrip­tures for wor­ship recently have brought out themes of judge­ment for me… some­thing that I’ve wres­tled with and tried to leave alone in the past. This time, though, I decided to fol­low the scrip­tures and words from wor­ship a bit further.

How do Chris­tians under­stand God’s judge­ment? My first impres­sion is a stern fig­ure who pun­ishes and rewards arbi­trar­ily, based on largely unknown and unde­fined fac­tors. I mean the first rule of thumb for edu­ca­tors in grad­ing is mak­ing very clear what the grades are for — rubrics, qual­ity indi­ca­tors, all those are stan­dards, but it God some­times is por­trayed as ran­dom with pun­ish­ment and rewards.

And this is just it. So often, I think I’m stuck on the idea of judge­ment as dish­ing out pun­ish­ments and rewards based on what peo­ple deserve. There’s lots to sug­gest this in the Bible too… espe­cially Psalms talk­ing about God going after the ene­mies of the Psalmist. But there’s another judge­ment… one to cel­e­brate and for which to give thanks; one that peo­ple and all cre­ation waits for with anticipation.

I won­der about these two views of judge­ment. They don’t seem to con­nect. Is this per­haps because judge­ment as pun­ish­ment and reward is a human con­cep­tion of judge­ment, not God’s? After all, God’s thoughts are not human thoughts, nor are God’s ways human ways. What if God’s way of judge­ment really is beau­ti­ful and some­thing to be adored and admired? What if God’s way of judge­ment looks ridicu­lous some­times and is filled with irra­tional grace, for­give­ness, and sec­ond and third and fourth chances? What if God’s judge­ment is not whom to rebuke and whom to reward, but how to restore all peo­ple and all cre­ation back to right-ness?

The story of the prodi­gal son read in today’s wor­ship ser­vice affirms this view of judge­ment. Both of the sons expect pun­ish­ment and reward based on actions and choices. The father’s response, though, comes from a dif­fer­ent par­a­digm — a par­a­digm of rec­on­cil­i­a­tion. Judge­ment here is choos­ing to cel­e­brate the return of the son and decid­ing to work at the restora­tion of relationship.

This seems to be God’s judge­ment — cer­tainly thoughts that are not human thoughts of deserv­ing and weigh­ing scales and ways that are not human ways of ret­ri­bu­tion. God is not puni­tive. God is restora­tive, mer­ci­ful, for­giv­ing, abun­dant in grace, and trans­forms even tragedy into goodness.

Think­ing of God’s beau­ti­ful judge­ment that restores, I too can cel­e­brate and wait with antic­i­pa­tion for God to bring all things back to wholeness.

329 (Roses and Supper)

It was our first expe­ri­ence lead­ing a 4-day trip with our Youth. They were a group of 15 — 5 boys, 10 girls. It was an inner-city trip, and we were learn­ing about ser­vice. We had planned a time for them to serve each other. The boys were mak­ing an elab­o­rate (okay, Side­kicks) meal for the girls. They were going to give each girl a rose, and then walk them to their seats. Since there were twice as many girls as boys, the girls would come five at a time, in two waves. With roses in hand, they lined up behind the door. The girls didn’t know what was com­ing (the roses or the sup­per). As the boys lined up, they all agreed: “Make sure we’re lined up and they’re lined up, we don’t want to have to pick.”

It wasn’t because they didn’t want to have to choose which of their friends to walk to the table, it was because they were wor­ried that by pick­ing they would inad­ver­tently leave some­one to be picked last. In this moment, I was instantly reminded of the fact that Youth can be incred­i­bly per­cep­tive and mature. These Youth were in grade 8.

When Elihu breaks into the scene in Job, he says, “It is not only the old who are wise, not only the aged who under­stand what is right.” Jesus him­self reit­er­ates this notion when he tells us we all need to become like lit­tle chil­dren. Work­ing with Youth has opened my eyes to the fact that, yes, while young peo­ple can be extremely ener­getic and some­times imma­ture, they can simul­ta­ne­ously be some of the most mature peo­ple I know. This story was just one brief exam­ple. There have been many others.

We have a lot to learn from young peo­ple. Energy. Pas­sion. Humour. Excite­ment. And matu­rity. It might not always seem obvi­ous, but some­times I wish the older gen­er­a­tion acted a lit­tle more like the young.

Tak­ing Heart,

Paul Loewen

Holding on, five times a day

Reflect­ing these weeks on “hold­ing on and let­ting go” as part of Lenten devo­tion­als, I notice yet again my urge to con­trol everything.

Even in writ­ing about choos­ing a per­sonal focus for Lent, my jour­nal records my unwill­ing­ness to let go — all of my Lent ideas involve hold­ing on, work­ing harder, try­ing again, push­ing and forc­ing myself to do what I think is good. Hold­ing on to every­thing with tight fists. There may be times for this kind of tenac­ity. After re-reading my brain­stormed list, though, I real­ize the most impor­tant thing I could con­cen­trate on this Lent is let­ting go.

Now I’m prac­tic­ing. I’m let­ting go of expec­ta­tions of per­fec­tion in my work and study. I’m let­ting go of judge­ment of myself when I don’t exer­cise and eat as well as I know I should. I’m let­ting go of try­ing to fix every­thing and of tak­ing on respon­si­bil­i­ties that are not really mine. I’m let­ting go of legal­ism, per­fec­tion­ism, and crit­i­cism, and begin­ning to see what remains that I need to hold on to.

A friend shared his expe­ri­ence of how he holds on. As a Mus­lim, he fol­lows the tra­di­tion of pray­ing five times a day. These moments become daily mark­ers of time and space for the essen­tial. A reminder of what he needs to let go and what he needs to hold on to. Hear­ing his expe­ri­ence, I rec­og­nize a need for  these reminders myself.

One step fur­ther. In addi­tion to prac­tic­ing let­ting go, I’ve started to stop at moments through­out the day (thanks to the mul­ti­ple alarms on my phone to alert me!) to remem­ber and pray. Every­thing else seems to slide into place and I feel cen­tred again. I remind myself too, like my friend says, that it’s not about legal­ism. If I miss a time, I “jump up” to the next, know­ing that I am free in God these moments are a gift, not an obligation.

Lent moves on another week and I keep try­ing to hold on, let go, and con­tinue the journey.

A Questionable Call?

This is our game. This game is for world hockey supremacy. We’ve heard the slo­gans. Col­lec­tively we’ve dis­played the pride, enjoyed the swag­ger in vic­tory and felt the blows in defeat. Per­haps in the quiet moments of a bath­room stall dur­ing inter­mis­sion or after this year’s world junior’s tour­na­ment we’ve even ques­tioned whether there is some­thing out of bal­ance, some over­com­pen­sa­tion hap­pen­ing but soon enough the puck drops, the beer is hoisted and we are again trans­ported into the dream of world dom­i­na­tion. I have not fol­lowed hockey for over ten years but the world juniors and the Olympics have drawn me deep into the cor­ners of the hockey world. I fol­lowed with dread the tri­als of team Canada as they teetered and then sta­bi­lized and then charged and then almost col­lapsed as they headed into over­time in the gold medal match. And we all know the out­come. But in my own world I con­tin­ued to travel deep into the oppo­si­tion zone of the hockey world. A place I was once at home in but it now felt strange and sud­denly I heard the whis­tle blow. Did I re-enter the hockey world off-side? The call comes from an unlikely Dan­ish offi­cial, but this inter­na­tional play after all. Embossed on the back of his black and white stripes is SK. But I am not off­side. It is a penalty called against team Canada. SK makes a strange hand ges­ture. I do not rec­og­nize the penalty call. He glides towards the penalty box and says Fort­vivlelse. I wait for the announcer to get a trans­la­tion and make the announce­ment. Then a voice comes over the speak­ers Team Canada has been called on … No, sorry cor­rec­tion Canada, the nation of Canada, has been called for Despair. They are asked to take a time-out to reflect on their rela­tion­ship with hockey.

Despair? A lit­tle harsh don’t you think? Tough call. Up in the media both they dig up some more infor­ma­tion on this offi­cial and they find that SK has a his­tory of hand­ing despair penal­ties. In fact they dig up one par­tic­u­larly con­tro­ver­sial account in which SK was asked to defend his call. The doc­u­ment cer­tainly dates the offi­cial which could raise even more eye­brows. The doc­u­ment was dated back to 1849. There was another nation who was given a time-out for despair. The media jumped on this doc­u­ment and fever­ishly cor­ralled ath­letes from the Dan­ish team to trans­late the doc­u­ment. In order to help Canada under­stand the call they replaced the name of the orig­i­nal coun­try with the word Canada. Through a for­tu­nate con­nec­tion I have obtained a por­tion of this document.

Canada says, ‘We will be Hockey or we will be noth­ing.’ What hap­pens if Canada does not become Hockey? Then they will be in despair. But they will not be in despair over the fact that they did not become Hockey rather they will be in despair because they could not rid them­selves of their iden­tity of not being Hockey. They hoped to become Hockey because they found them­selves, their iden­tity, intol­er­a­ble. And so, they are in despair. But per­haps they will stand atop the podium and Canada will be declared Hockey to the whole world. Surely then they will not be despair. They will have rid them­selves of them­selves and become who they thought they should be. But what then have they done? They’ve suc­ceeded. They’ve now rid them­selves of their iden­tity and become Hockey. And so they are lost, they are not them­selves. They are in despair. And so I stand by my call. And the penalty is hardly a harsh one, though it could be the most harsh. I sim­ply ask that Canada stand alone with­out hockey, at least for a time and see who they are. They are then free to play, to not play, to play well, to play poorly.

It seems that the IOC has found out that SK was never meant to offi­ci­ate this game. He found his way into the tour­na­ment under a pseu­do­nym. Some­thing he has tried on numer­ous other occa­sions. And so secu­rity has come onto the ice to remove him. He makes no objec­tions and gives no resis­tance. He seems con­tent. He has made his call. Canada is called on despair. They either lose them­selves or can­not stand them­selves. A ques­tion­able call from a ques­tion­able offi­cial? Well, either way the time-out is almost over and Canada is free to get back in the game if they so choose.

1923 (Immortality)

They say that every­thing on the inter­net is for­ever. Well, if that’s the case, one of my life’s goals is done! Which one, you ask? To have some­thing I have done or said immor­tal­ized. If the internet’s data truly lasts for­ever, then there’s a lot that I’ve done that’s been immor­tal­ized. Every email I have sent will go down in Gmail’s servers for all eternity…

It wasn’t always this way. Scrolls are frag­ile. Peo­ple that could write were few. Writ­ten words we con­tained in jars of clay, held onto sacredly. With no record­ing devices, spo­ken words would have to be writ­ten down to keep them in memory.

Job’s words, “Oh, that my words were recorded…” make me laugh. He may never have known that he got his wish. His words have been recorded and read by more peo­ple than any other lit­er­ary work. Quite the immor­tal­iza­tion. I hope to write a lot in my life­time, but I know my words will never go down in his­tory like his did. This led to an inter­est­ing thought…

Did the Bible’s writ­ers have any idea what they were doing?

Did they real­ize that their words would be read by count­less peo­ple? Did they real­ize that peo­ple would stake their lives on the words they eeked out on crumbly scrolls? Did they know that their words would be called canon, holy?

I have no doubt they felt inspired to write what they wrote or say what they said. But so do many peo­ple today, and the canon is already closed. We’re not adding 20th or 21st cen­tury prophets to the Bible. That’s over and done. Pic­ture Job, aching and in pain, wish­ing his words were recorded. Pic­ture Paul, hunched over a desk, quill in hand, writ­ing by can­dle­light. I wish I could go back and whis­per, “Do you know what you’re writ­ing? Do you know how much those words mean?”

Write and speak like your words will mean as much to peo­ple in 3,000 years as Job’s do to us.

Tak­ing Heart,

Paul

Robotic Warfare: Making This World Safe?

Last week Preda­tor drones attacked in Hel­mand province in South­ern Afghanistan and mis­tak­enly killed civil­ians.  We don’t know how many.  The inci­dents are another warn­ing like the mes­sages of protest that Pak­ista­nis have been try­ing to send Amer­i­cans for the past few years.  Despite the much bal­ly­hooed pre­ci­sion of these air crafts and their weapons, they still kill civil­ians because cor­rob­o­rat­ing intel­li­gence on the ground is unre­li­able and this leads to flawed targeting.

The pro­tec­tion of civil­ians has been a most basic plank of all notions of just war for many nations going back 1600 years.  The slide towards increased killing of civil­ians in war by national armies and as a corol­lary, the use of civil­ians as human shields is often over­looked.   Tac­tics aris­ing from the use of robotic weapons of war may increase the slide of dis­re­spect for civil­ian life in war.  This trend that brought us civil­ian casu­al­ties from Dres­den to Hiroshima, from IEDs in Iraq to drones in Pak­istan reflect the broad lines of increased dis­re­spect for civil­ian life into the 21st cen­tury war­fare in reg­u­lar and insur­gent armies.

Dur­ing the final week of Lent this year I expect to travel to Las Vegas and to Creech AFB 45 miles north­west where the Preda­tor pilots and their staffs are trained and local con­trol rooms guide the planes in the 24 hour sur­veil­lance and attack assign­ments over Pak­istan, Iraq and Afghanistan.  As I go I know that the Preda­tors are just a tip of a vast array of robotic tech­nol­ogy now being devel­oped to make mod­ern war­fare “safer” for sol­diers but more lethal for civilians.

The Preda­tor and their Hell­fire mis­siles are the air weapon deliv­ery sys­tem of choice right now but maybe not for long.  In the future the work of dis­ar­ma­ment will be made even more com­pli­cated by robotic instru­ments of all kinds. The U. S. Army is work­ing with uni­ver­si­ties to build micro fliers, tiny bird like fly­ers to be used for intel­li­gence gath­er­ing and sur­veil­lance through its Micro Autonomous Sys­tems and Tech­nol­ogy Col­lab­o­ra­tive Alliance.  Joseph Mait, man­ager of the Army Research Lab­o­ra­tory says,“   Our long-term goal is to develop tech­nolo­gies that can pro­duce a map of a build­ing inte­rior or detect bombs,”

Big unmanned Preda­tor like air­craft have lots of prob­lems. They are still expen­sive to build, main­tain and fly although they are much cheaper than the ear­lier gen­er­a­tions of bombers.  They can also be easy to spot.  In Pak­istan I was told that chil­dren in remote areas have games they play called, “spot­ting the Preda­tors”.   Shrink­ing those vehi­cles to a few ounces will not only change the children’s games but will give an up-close view of who is doing what, when and where.

Accord­ing to Dis­cov­ery Mag­a­zine,  Haibo Dong of Wright State Uni­ver­sity is work­ing on a four-winged robot, the Wright Dragon flyer. The design­ers com­plain that it is more dif­fi­cult to cre­ate than a two-winged flap­ping sys­tem but promises more speed and manoeu­ver­abil­ity. Dong expects to have a pro­to­type, about the size of a real dragon-fly, com­pleted this year. “This small craft could per­form sur­veil­lance, envi­ron­men­tal mon­i­tor­ing and search and res­cue,” he says.

At Har­vard Uni­ver­sity roboti­cist Robert Wood is work­ing on mechan­i­cal bee-like instru­ments to cre­ate a colony of RoboBees. These swarm­ing robots will incor­po­rate opti­cal and chem­i­cal sen­sors as well as com­mu­ni­ca­tions sys­tems to make autonomous flight deci­sions and to coor­di­nate with colony mem­bers dur­ing tasks such as search­ing for objects or people.

Robotic tech­nol­ogy is already heav­ily used in all of America’s wars.  As many as 4000 robots are already on the ground in Iraq. Tiny infor­ma­tion gath­er­ing devices are com­ple­mented by robotic instru­ments designed to iden­tify and dis­arm bombs.  With ground mobil­ity they can enter into dan­ger­ous set­tings where enemy sol­diers are heav­ily armed.  Some of these instru­ments are being adapted for or are already used for in the home­land secu­rity.  Their phe­nom­e­nal growth will change for­ever the arms race, the bal­ance of power(s) in the world and the nature of police work.

The eth­i­cal impli­ca­tions of this rev­o­lu­tion of arms, force and infor­ma­tion gath­er­ing are daunting.

1.  The devel­op­ment, deploy­ment, and use of the instru­ments of robotic war­fare are being car­ried out in at least 40 coun­tries around the world.  A robotic arms race is already under way.  There are few if any forums that address the impli­ca­tions of this race for the future of life on earth and for the qual­ity of life-like basic freedoms.

2.  As the robotic arms move­ment unfolds, the pos­si­bil­ity for back yard devel­op­ment of instru­ments of destruc­tion reaches to the lim­its of  imag­i­na­tion.  Vio­lent video games were just a begin­ning although they may have helped dull our sen­si­tiv­ity and cre­ate a cul­ture of accep­tance.  The IED (impro­vised explo­sive device)  an  interim instru­ment for defence and attack for insur­gents will have been just the first gen­er­a­tion of a long line of sophis­ti­cated adap­ta­tion of off the shelf tech­nol­ogy for killing.  The dis­tance between the safe researcher silently work­ing in a san­i­tized lab­o­ra­tory and the field prac­ti­tioner is nar­row­ing.  The absence of mean­ing­ful work for so many in this gen­er­a­tion may become the void  where new waves of  imag­i­na­tion in the ser­vice of vio­lence are unleashed.  Non­vi­o­lence move­ments will match this chal­lenge only with keen under­stand­ing of the impli­ca­tions of robotic devel­op­ments and solid healthy organizations.

3.  As civil­ian casu­al­ties grow, per­sons who believe that life is sacred are faced with enor­mous new chal­lenges.  Peace­mak­ers and human rights work­ers have only begun to grasp the impli­ca­tions of robotic war­fare.  Peo­ple on the ground in Pak­istan told me that just 10% of the vic­tims of Preda­tor drone bomb­ings are insur­gent com­bat­ants. Ninety per­cent are civil­ians. The l Pak­istan Secu­rity Mon­i­tor, a project of the School for Inter­na­tional Stud­ies at Simon Fraser Uni­ver­sity dis­putes these fig­ures.  I have trav­elled in Pak­istan and have heard the esti­mated 90% fig­ure from per­sons with access to the areas of impact with accom­pa­ny­ing sto­ries of tra­vail and death to women and children..

For Chris­t­ian paci­fists the reach of research, devel­op­ment, and man­u­fac­ture dips into every one of our com­mu­ni­ties.  We are now faced with new chal­lenges to our con­vic­tions about not killing.  Unless we face those oncom­ing ambi­gu­i­ties with­out falling into legal­ism, the con­vic­tions will morph into fluffy cot­ton dec­o­ra­tion over a core of words that are not backed up with action.

4.  As we enter this new fron­tier of ethics and robotic war­fare, our meth­ods of wit­ness for a non­vi­o­lent way will be forced to adapt.  The cen­tral­iza­tion of the devel­op­ment and man­u­fac­ture of killer instru­ments into fewer and fewer cor­po­ra­tions and selected polit­i­cal pow­ers is over.  The time is here when ordi­nary peo­ple can go to the local com­puter store or amazon.com to order com­po­nent parts for assem­bling a weapon.  What will we do if the com­puter store owner even goes to our church or parish?  What will we do if peo­ple in our church own stock in com­pa­nies that pro­duce the com­po­nents? We won’t have to go to Wash­ing­ton or to some well-mannered leg­isla­tive office to begin the dis­cus­sion and to engage in pub­lic witness.

We are now swim­ming in the cul­ture of robot­ics, a tech­nol­ogy that is being adapted every day by nations around the world to myr­iad roles that include secu­rity and killing.  We can watch in admi­ra­tion or dis­taste as the magic is unveiled .  In peri­ods of tran­si­tion and unfold­ing vio­lence it takes a lit­tle time for our con­sciences to be awak­ened and the gift of stub­born resis­tance to become clear.  The time has arrived.

Boiled Down

It is encour­ag­ing at cer­tain points to expe­ri­ence life, at least at that moment, as hav­ing been boiled down, clar­i­fied, dis­tilled. I am not sure there is much more to Chris­t­ian life, which is to say life, than prayer and wor­ship. Per­haps there is only wor­ship or only prayer or some third unknown descrip­tion. But for now I still find it help­ful to speak of the two.

Pray with­out ceasing

Let every­thing that has breathe praise the LORD

All things may be prayer and wor­ship. My breath­ing, my eat­ing, my com­ing and my going. My buy­ing and sell­ing, giv­ing and tak­ing. My sit­ting and lying. My speech and my act.

I went for a run today and I did not care (much) for the ben­e­fits I used to hope from this expres­sion (bet­ter fit­ness and self-image) I did not incor­po­rate tech­niques to make my run more effi­cient or effec­tive . I ran and breathed and looked and thought. I ran to the ceme­tery at the edge of town and sat on a bench. It was one of the first sunny almost warm days and on the bench the sun shown directly on my face and the tree behind me blocked the wind. And every­thing was just glo­ri­ous, utterly glo­ri­ous in that moment.

I real­ized then that had I not done this, had I not run in that way at that time I would have been guilty of blas­phemy a fully uncon­scious expres­sion of sin and heresy. This led me then to the much more hum­bling real­iza­tion that much of my life is blasphemy.