Monthly Archive for December, 2008

Come All Ye Faithful

If there is one thing that I have been impressed with in prepar­ing for ser­mons these days it has been in notic­ing the cen­tral­ity of wor­ship in the bib­li­cal wit­ness.  This should of course go with­out say­ing and yet I don’t think we reflect the bib­li­cal con­cern.  First it was return­ing to the prophets and before I lis­tened to Isaiah’s con­cern for social injus­tices I allowed myself to hear how this judg­ment is rooted in faith­ful wor­ship or what had turned into unfaith­ful wor­ship (Isa­iah 1).  Then in Advent I reflected on the visit of the angel Gabriel to Mary.  I took note for the first time that Gabriel is only men­tioned in the book of Daniel in the Old Tes­ta­ment and there Gabriel brings a polit­i­cal vision of the end of the world.  This vision came in the con­text of Daniel’s prayer.  In Luke both Gabriel’s mes­sage and Mary’s response are steeped in Old Tes­ta­ment imagery.  The imagery is polit­i­cal but also litur­gi­cal.  There appears to be an inte­gra­tion of wor­ship and pol­i­tics that we still do not yet fully under­stand (well I will speak for myself).  We say that wor­ship and work are one but I am not sure that is help­ful.  There is only wor­ship.  There is only liturgy, whether it is to a true or a false god.

Now I am in the midst of prepar­ing a mes­sage for Epiphany, the vis­i­ta­tion of the Magi.  The Magi bring gifts of gold, incense and myrrh.  This gift giv­ing is set in the larger con­text again of the Old Tes­ta­ment where the nations will come and bring their wealth to the house of God.  This imagery always dis­turbed me.  I never felt com­fort­able think­ing that this vision was one of increas­ing power through the means of earthly wealth.  It did not fit with the expe­ri­ence of the Sec­ond Tem­ple Israelites and cer­tainly it did not fit with the min­istry of Jesus.  I decided, how­ever, do per­form a sim­ply search of ‘gold’, frank­in­cense’ and ‘myrrh’.  What I found was that all of these mate­ri­als are used pre­dom­i­nantly if not exclu­sively for the pur­poses of wor­ship, par­tic­u­larly in the Tem­ple and Taber­na­cle.  Even gold’s use as a mea­sure of mon­e­tary worth is far and away over­shad­owed by use in wor­ship.  Wor­ship and work are not one.  There is only wor­ship.  The nations who come with their trea­sures do so to join in the song.  This too is the vision of Rev­e­la­tion.  God’s King­dom is restored as a litur­gi­cal com­mu­nity.  It is from this place that peace and jus­tice will be restored.  It is to this end that we must re-conceive both wor­ship and work.  The cen­ter of our wor­ship­ping com­mu­nity has been born.  Come all ye faith­ful.  Come let us adorn him.

The Joy of God’s Love

Her excite­ment emerged long before the hol­i­day sea­son began. She shook with antic­i­pa­tion each time the word Christ­mas came near her ears. As the day drew closer, her enthu­si­asm rose until it spilled out in excess energy, flood­ing through her home and try­ing the under­stand­ing of her fam­ily mem­bers.  The sight of the Christ­mas tree, taste of candy canes, the end­less pos­si­bil­i­ties of the brightly-wrapped pack­ages over­whelmed her some­times to the point of tears.

Finally, Christ­mas Day arrived. Well, Christ­mas for the cousins and fam­ily. Her joy com­plete, my cousin spent the day spin­ning from rel­a­tive to rel­a­tive, laugh­ter and smiles spewed all over them. Her rejoic­ing mul­ti­plied when met with the other cousins, some choco­late and candy, and of course the sweet sat­is­fac­tion of hand­ing out the Christ­mas gifts that had been stored so neatly for so long under the sparkling tree. 

As the wrap­ping paper set­tled, her own open gifts, viva­ciously received, lay near their boxes. Her fes­tiv­ity car­ried on, the day unend­ing even as the evening approached.

I mar­vel at her fer­vor and learn from my young cousin of the won­der and joy of God’s love. Christ­mas continues.

Who is this Jesus?

Who is this Jesus who will be born to us tomor­row? Is he a Jew? An Israelite of the House of David? Born of a vir­gin? Born in a sta­ble? The rea­son for the season?

Try­ing to define Jesus in a few words of a phrase seems a dis­ser­vice to the man I claim I try to fol­low. So, let me tell you what I do know. Though every child is a mir­a­cle, Jesus was the most miraculous.

He will come to us tomor­row, a help­less new­born child.

Are we ready to receive him?

Merry Christmas

Yes­ter­day some­thing strange hap­pened. I was doing some last mi nute Christ­mas shop­ping and after pur­chas­ing a gift for my aunt, the clerk wished me and my brother a Merry Christmas.

This is some­thing that hardly ever hap­pens. I have often been on the receiv­ing end of “Happy Hol­i­days,” or my per­sonal least favourite, “Season’s Greet­ings.” To peo­ple who say these things, I ask (in my mind), why are you greet­ing me? What sea­son are we in? Win­ter? Why are we happy? What hol­i­days are we cel­e­brat­ing? Clearly, we are not cel­e­brat­ing win­ter, nor are we happy because we are shop­ping until we are drop­ping. We are cel­e­brat­ing Christmas.

I wouldn’t have any prob­lems if peo­ple wished me a Merry Christ­mas or Happy any other hol­i­day. Unfor­tu­nately, few other hol­i­days seem to get any pub­lic­ity. At the library I saw a stack of Christ­mas, Hanukkah and Kwan­zaa books, beau­ti­fully arranged for the hol­i­day sea­son. This is a lovely idea. But, I have yet to meet any­one who cel­e­brates Kwan­zaa (per­haps I just travel in the wrong cir­cles), and though my knowl­edge of Judaism is lim­ited, I am con­fi­dent there are more impor­tant hol­i­days in the Jew­ish year.

Wouldn’t it be bet­ter if those other hol­i­days were acknowl­edged? And indeed if all impor­tant reli­gious hol­i­days were acknowl­edged? Wouldn’t it be bet­ter if we as a soci­ety were able to move away from our appar­ent fear of reli­gion and being to under­stand our neigh­bours’ tra­di­tions so that we could wish them a Happy [insert hol­i­day here], not just a lame, cop-out happy hol­i­days in December?

Christmas in Jesus’ home town

In the days before and fol­low­ing Christ­mas, Nazareth Vil­lage puts on a Christ­mas play.  It is staged in the first cen­tury build­ings and gives vis­i­tors a feel for what it may have looked like at that time.  In this play I have been given the role of the Angel Gabriel.  In the lines that the nar­ra­tor reads lead­ing up to my entrance she talks about the Angel Gabriel who appears to Mary in Nazareth.  When I hear this, I always think about how strange it is that I am actu­ally in Nazareth in a first cen­tury recre­ation of Nazareth town act­ing out the part of an angel appear­ing to Mary who lived here at the time. And yet, real­iz­ing this has never really made me feel more Christ­massy about the whole thing. Shouldn’t one feel closer to Jesus in Beth­le­hem or Nazareth par­tic­u­larly when sur­rounded by 1st cen­tury repli­cas? Many I talk to who visit this part of the world do not feel closer to Jesus here while there are those who most def­i­nitely do feel his pres­ence more strongly here than other places.

Fam­ily tra­di­tions sur­round­ing Christ­mas have always been very impor­tant to me for cre­at­ing the “feel” of Christ­mas. It is also a time for fam­ily in my view and so being away from fam­ily does make it more dif­fi­cult for me per­son­ally feel fes­tive about Christ­mas. How­ever, at the same time I am soak­ing up the oppor­tu­nity to be part of a new cul­ture and new tra­di­tions while devel­op­ing a new fam­ily of rela­tion­ships. I am not feel­ing sorry for myself at all, I am just observ­ing that Christ­mas is really about tra­di­tion and fel­low­ship for me per­son­ally and so the part I play in expe­ri­enc­ing Christ­mas here is really the part of an observer.

What I have appre­ci­ated about Christ­mas here is the lack of adver­tise­ment and gen­eral mate­ri­al­is­tic hype lead­ing up to Christ­mas.  I under­stand that there is more of this hype in Beth­le­hem itself but again doesn’t com­pare the hol­i­day sea­son splen­dor in North Amer­ica.  So what is the mean­ing of Christ­mas? Let’s con­sider the first Christ­mas of Jesus’ birth in the time of Herod’s rule and a time under gen­eral Roman occu­pa­tion. What is strik­ing is the con­trast of a sim­ple sta­ble scene, of sim­ple shep­herds in the fields, a sim­ple young woman, all tak­ing part in some­thing that would become a new way of look­ing at the word “king­dom”. So per­haps I should reeval­u­ate my low key Christ­mas this year and con­sider myself closer to the mean­ing of Christ­mas in its very sim­plic­ity and in the prox­im­ity to the atmos­phere of oppres­sion and empire that would have existed at the time of Jesus.

What has become very clear to me is this –I do not care if Mary was or was not eter­nally a vir­gin, or if the three wise men came when Jesus was three or one year old or if Jesus was born in this cave or that stone house.  What does mat­ter is that in the humil­ity and simul­ta­ne­ous coura­geous author­ity of his fel­low­ship and shar­ing with peo­ple, Jesus shat­tered the pre­con­ceived soci­etal norms, loved those who seemed unlov­able to oth­ers and pointed them toward God while open­ing their eyes to see beyond their imme­di­ate polit­i­cal and reli­gious envi­ron­ment. The divine Son of God came to live as a per­son among peo­ple, eat­ing with them, suf­fer­ing with them and ulti­mately offer­ing a free­dom from the dom­i­nance of empire, social repres­sion, and reli­gious elit­ism not through escape from these real­i­ties but through inti­mate knowl­edge with them and the capac­ity to see beyond in cer­tain hope.  The free­dom he offered was a king­dom we have part in that has come and is still com­ing and is one that offers free­dom through the promise of an eter­nal life that will never be cap­tured, boxed, and sold in bite-sized pack­ages. Can Chris­tian­ity today claim that it does the same?

Masculinity and the Church — Part II.1 — Understanding the Gendered Jesus through Graham Ward’s Cities of God

The the­o­log­i­cal con­struct of gen­der that I am adopt­ing for this explo­ration is taken directly from the work of Gra­ham Ward in his books Cities of God and Christ and Cul­ture.[1] Ward’s chap­ter “The Dis­placed Body of Jesus Christ” in Cities of God out­lines his par­tic­u­lar under­stand­ing of the gen­dered Jesus. In this chap­ter Ward finds in the Gospels the insta­bil­ity of Jesus’ gen­der. From his birth Jesus appears to issue from promise and not from cop­u­la­tion. Jesus comes from vir­gin flesh and the line of Joseph. In med­ical terms the male Jesus who is cir­cum­cised (we assume his biol­ogy is con­firmed here) issues from the XX chro­mo­so­mal female­ness of his mother. Through his life the body of Jesus exhibits unusual expres­sions. “This man can walk on water. This man can sweat blood. This man can bring life. This man can mul­ti­ply mate­r­ial so that five thou­sand are fed from a few loaves and fish. This man can heal by touch; and not just heal but cre­ate – wine from water, the eyes of the man born blind, the ear of the Tem­ple guard.”[2] The body of Jesus and the mate­ri­als in con­tact with him are desta­bi­lized and often under­goe trans­fig­u­ra­tions. “I am the way, the truth, the life, the Tem­ple, the bread, the light, the vine, and the gate.”[3] Christ is gen­dered but not bound by a gen­der. In his body Jesus tran­scends gen­der tak­ing bread, break­ing it and say­ing this is my body. Ward also points to Jesus’ trans­fig­u­ra­tion on the moun­tain say­ing that the ‘body’ of God’s glory was shown through Christ’s body. At the Last Sup­per Christ breaks his body so that a new social embod­i­ment might be revealed. “Bod­ies are not only trans­fig­urable, they are trans­pos­able. In being trans­pos­able, while always being sin­gu­lar­i­ties and speci­fici­ties, the body of Christ can cross bound­aries, eth­nic bound­aries, gen­der bound­aries, socio-economic bound­aries for exam­ple. Christ’s body as bread is no longer Jesus as sim­ply and bio­log­i­cally male.”[4]
At the cru­ci­fix­ion Jesus’ body is objec­ti­fied, degen­dered, dis­placed as it is acted upon as meat and not human. But that is only in rela­tion to the struc­tural pow­ers of law. The­o­log­i­cally the body is still dis­placed, dis­tanced, but it is also gen­dered in the fem­i­nine as mother. The pierced side of Jesus issues blood and water birthing the church. In the eucharis­tic body we are joined through tak­ing in Christ. In the cru­ci­fied body we are issued from the side of Christ. Ward draws great sig­nif­i­cance for us as we are caught up in these move­ments. Ward is worth com­ment­ing in full here,

It is not sim­ply that the phys­i­cal body of Jesus is dis­placed in the Chris­t­ian story, our bod­ies too par­tic­i­pate in that dis­place­ment in and through the cru­ci­fix­ion. At the eucharist we receive and are acted upon; now hav­ing been brought into rela­tion and fac­ing the acknowl­edge­ment of the break­ing of that rela­tion read­ers rec­og­nize dis­place­ment of the body as part of Chris­t­ian liv­ing. Our bod­ies too, sex­u­ally spe­cific, will per­form in ways which trans­gress the gen­dered bound­aries of estab­lished codes. In the Chris­t­ian tra­di­tion which fol­lows, men will become moth­ers … women will become vir­ile.[5]

At the res­ur­rec­tion Christ’s body is raised cor­po­real but exhibits itself as even more unsta­ble then in his prior life. He is now able to dis­ap­pear, hide his iden­tity and walk through walls. This increased insta­bil­ity rein­forces to us that Christ’s iden­tity and per­haps the iden­tity of bod­ies in gen­eral can­not be finally deter­mined, they keep their mys­tery and are able to offer rev­e­la­tion from that place.[6] Ward writes that,

The appear­ance / dis­ap­pear­ance struc­ture of Christ’s res­ur­rected body serves to empha­size the medi­a­tion of that body – its inabil­ity to be fully present, to be an object to be grasped, cat­a­logued, atom­ized, com­pre­hended. The appear­ance / dis­ap­pear­ance serves as a focus for what has been evi­dent through­out – the body as a mys­tery, as a mate­ri­al­ity which can never fully reveal, must always con­ceal, some­thing of the pro­fun­dity of its exis­tence.[7]

With the ascen­sion Jesus’ body receives its final dis­place­ment. Ward is quick to point out though “that dis­place­ment is not the era­sure but the expan­sion of the body.”[8] In many ways it is Paul who is our inter­preter of the ascended body of Christ when he writes in Colos­sians that the Church is his body, the full­ness of him who fills all in all. “The final dis­place­ment of the gen­dered body of Jesus Christ, always aporetic and trans­gress­ing bound­aries, is the multi­gen­dered body of the Church.”[9] As the cru­ci­fix­ion is turned onto its head as an event of birthing so to the ascend­ing of Christ, Christ ‘leav­ing,’ is a cre­at­ing of space for the divine-human rela­tion­ship which Ward states clear­ing as re-establishing,

a new anthro­pol­ogy, a new way of being human as being en Christo as the church.… The body of Jesus Christ, the body of God, is per­me­able, transcor­po­real, trans­po­si­tional. Within it all other bod­ies are sit­u­ated and given their sig­nif­i­cance. We are all per­me­able, transcor­po­real, trans­po­si­tional. ‘There is nei­ther Jew nor Greek, there is nei­ther bond nor free, there is nei­ther male nor female, for ye are all one in Christ.’ … The body of Christ is a multi­gen­dered body.[10]


[1] Gra­ham Ward, Cities of God (New York: Rout­ledge, 2000); Christ and Cul­ture (Malden, MA: Black­well Pub­lish­ing, 2005).

[2] Cities of God, 100.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid., 103.

[5] Ibid., 106.

[6] Ibid., 109.

[7] Ibid., 111.

[8] Ibid., 112.

[9] Ibid.

[10] Ibid., 113.

Still waiting…

Some­thing I’ve been think­ing about a lot lately is The Future. In April, if all goes well, I will grad­u­ate and then I will be able to add two let­ters to my name. After that, what? I remem­ber when I was fin­ish­ing up at Water­loo I strug­gled to decide if I should serve with MCC or go to grad school. I guess in the end I some­how felt that MCC was the right deci­sion at that time. You could say I heard God call­ing me to Nicaragua, although I never heard any­thing explic­itly telling me where I should go and what I should do.

Now I wait to hear God’s call again. This is chal­leng­ing. In life I like things that are fin­ished, that are clear. (In Myers-Briggs I’m a J). Maybe if I break it down it will be eas­ier to under­stand? Here goes. Now. In this moment, at this time, I am writ­ing essays. I am try­ing fran­ti­cally to fin­ish every­thing in my life this week and enjoy my Christ­mas hol­i­days. I wait. Wait­ing. This seems to be a theme lately in my life. Maybe Advent could teach me to be a bet­ter wait-er. Maybe I can learn the les­son this Advent? To hear. This implies some kind of sound. God’s call. How do we know that we heard God’s call? What does it sound like? It is just a release of anx­i­ety? Because those never last very long for me. Again. If I heard it once before, shouldn’t I be able to hear it again. Each part is now under­stood. How hard can it be to live?

The BS Meter

While I was a youth pas­tor, I would often receive var­i­ous admo­ni­tions.  Some would speak of the impor­tance of a job like mine in a day when the youth were so com­pletely cor­rupted.  Some won­dered how I could have received such an easy and enjoy­able posi­tion.  And then there were the ones offer­ing pro­fes­sional advice.  Some would hap­pily say that today’s youth are the future of the church, and I would respond with some vari­a­tion of “if they are not engaged in the church of the present, they won’t stick around to lead the church of the future.”  But the com­ment I heard most often, espe­cially from experts in the field, was that teenagers have tremen­dous BS meters.

Some­how this was upheld as their great­est con­tri­bu­tion to the church.  Locat­ing insin­cer­ity is cer­tainly impor­tant, and teenagers seem hard­wired to read­ily com­plain about the actions of adults that are hyp­o­crit­i­cal, out­dated or unre­al­is­tic.  Still there was always some­thing about this com­ment that both­ered me.  I won­dered where else this skill might come in handy.  I quickly real­ized that in every aspect of life we could ben­e­fit from know­ing where the BS is.  With that I also real­ized that youth often have ter­ri­ble BS meters in places out­side of the church.

Teenagers hate being judged by their elders for their irreg­u­lar church atten­dance or for the way they dress at church and that judge­ment will not moti­vate them to change.  They rightly rec­og­nize that as BS.  Today’s high schools are full of a vari­ety of fash­ion trends, but most teenagers dress exactly the same as their friends.  Teenagers will still insist that their par­ents respect their indi­vid­u­al­ity, help­ing them to buy clothes that fit their “unique” style.  That’s BS.

Teenagers hate con­gre­ga­tional shar­ing time.  They know exactly who is going to share, the level of emo­tion they’ll show, and what they are going to com­plain about and they know that all the adults know this too. They think it’s BS that every­one still nods politely and promises to take this con­cern to prayer.  Teenagers will also reli­giously watch a TV pro­gram that they say they hate, fea­tur­ing char­ac­ters that they hate, in a genre they say is stu­pid.  That’s BS.

As soon as teenagers are old enough that they’ve been taught to think crit­i­cally, they start to won­der about mirac­u­lous accounts in the Bible.  They doubt that any­one around them actu­ally believes they hap­pened, and they think it’s BS that nobody ques­tions the sto­ries and that they are taught to chil­dren as facts.  With this mind­set, you’d think that they would respond intel­lec­tu­ally, pos­ing crit­i­cal argu­ments, when they were pre­sented sit­u­a­tions where their friends pro­mote lifestyles of are swear­ing, drink­ing, smok­ing, pre­mar­i­tal sex, drug abuse, etc.  They don’t, and that’s BS.

Now, I know I am gen­er­al­iz­ing unfairly.  I have writ­ten in a way that paints all teenagers with the same brush, no mat­ter how good they actu­ally are.  When I was a teenager, I had some pretty BS ways of think­ing as well.  How­ever, my main point is that it is equally inac­cu­rate to make the gen­er­al­iza­tion that teenagers have good BS detec­tors.  All of us have ways of know­ing when peo­ple are being insin­cere.  Some­times we just under­stand our place within the respect lad­der and we keep our mouths shut.  Teenagers don’t always accept that posi­tion.  Some­times that’s good.  Some­times that’s bad.

There are a few other con­no­ta­tions to this whole BS meter the­ory.  It implies a warn­ing, that I should not try to be insin­cere with teenagers, because they’ll know it.  If I hear­ing this the­ory will stop me from being insin­cere with teenagers, maybe I’m not cut out for youth min­istry.  Also, it sug­gests that I should seek the coun­sel of teenagers when try­ing to dis­cern if some­one is being sin­cere or not.  That isn’t an appeal­ing Sun­day School class to me.  The church cal­en­dar offers enough other things where gos­sip can take place, a youth Sun­day School class shouldn’t be one.

There is so much about this whole idea that to me is inac­cu­rate, incon­sid­er­ate and insincere.

When Elephants Fight

“When ele­phants fight, it is the grass that gets tram­pled” says an African proverb.  This say­ing is often applied to a sit­u­a­tion where ten­sions between polit­i­cal pow­ers result in suf­fer­ing of the unin­volved com­mu­ni­ties of peo­ple at the grass roots level. Here I am, in Nazareth, in a part of the world where this proverb can so aptly be applied and yet I find myself los­ing track of who the ele­phants are and who the grass is. Don’t mis­un­der­stand what I’m saying…I am a typ­i­cal social jus­tice type Men­non­ite in my beliefs about injus­tices and the wall here in Israel/Palestine etc.  And if I label the sit­u­a­tion as “com­pli­cated” per­haps I will suf­fer the wrath of those who would say it a sim­ple mat­ter of lob­by­ing one’s gov­ern­ment because it is clearly the gov­ern­ments who can make the dif­fer­ence if they would only change their policies.

A story recently came out about a Jew­ish “museum of tol­er­ance” planned to be built on a Mus­lim grave­yard site in Jerusalem. The irony of the sit­u­a­tion is ratio­nal­ized away by lan­guage about rights, Jerusalem’s space issues, and the fact that the entire city is prob­a­bly built on bones anyway.

But if you remove your­self from the sit­u­a­tion for just a moment (which is dif­fi­cult to do when you live here) you real­ize how ludi­crous the ratio­nale is and yet this is the very ratio­nale that most gov­ern­ments base their action on when it comes to sit­u­a­tions of “injus­tice”.  In the first cen­tury when the Jews of Nazareth were being oppressed by the occu­py­ing Roman gov­ern­ment, they looked for a leader/or lead­ers who might lead them to some­thing that they under­stood as jus­tice.  Then when a 30+ year old Jesus stood up in the syn­a­gogue in Nazareth to read from the scroll of Isa­iah and when he so elo­quently took pas­sages from Isa­iah 61 and 58 all talk­ing about free­dom from oppres­sion, those gath­ered in the syn­a­gogue were elated! Yes finally, some­one who under­stood their sit­u­a­tion and would lead them, by the power of all those amaz­ing things they had heard he did in towns sur­round­ing them, to free­dom and justice.

Jesus turned the sit­u­a­tion on its head, ques­tioned the faith of those gath­ered and talked about a free­dom and a ful­fill­ment that did fit the demands of those gath­ered in the syn­a­gogue. In response to the sug­ges­tion that his min­istry and God’s mes­sage was for all – Jew and Gen­tile – those gath­ered were ready to kill Jesus (see Luke chap­ter 4:16–30).

Jesus has always sym­bol­ized the third way to Anabap­tists and this story in the syn­a­gogue in Nazareth is yet another exam­ple of how he so cre­atively and provoca­tively achieved this.  How would he cre­atively and provoca­tively find a third way today in Israel/Palestine? Yes there are polit­i­cal pow­ers who are clearly ele­phants but then there are other ele­phants who pose as grass and grass that abuses power like an ele­phant would. The sit­u­a­tion how­ever, is not more com­pli­cated than it is has ever been.  How did Jesus nav­i­gate the crazi­ness of his con­text? He sim­ply lived, chal­lenged the sta­tus quo in love of those who he came into con­tact with and that in itself was some­how rev­o­lu­tion­ary enough to get him killed. Sim­ply the integrity and truth of his being was enough to chal­lenge the pow­ers and enough to com­fort and encour­age the oppressed at the same time.

It’s a para­dox that I con­tin­u­ally strive to under­stand but risk mak­ing more com­pli­cated than it need be in my search to uncover it. 

My Two Advent Cents — The Discipline of Comfort

I thought I would inter­rupt my post­ing series to leave my own two cents on Advent.  For those of you who are fol­low­ing the wor­ship series from Leader mag­a­zine last Sun­day you would have encoun­tered the “The Com­fort­ing Face of God.”  The lec­tionary texts include Isa­iah 40 Com­fort, Com­fort my peo­ple … Hear the voice of one call­ing, ‘pre­pare a way in the desert’ … and then also Mark 1 which is John the Bap­tist doing as much from the desert.  As I pre­pared to preach for that Sun­day thought of ‘com­fort’ as a topic in our North Amer­i­can con­text left me feel­ing a lit­tle uncom­fort­able.  Yes, I know that indeed we are often in great need of com­fort in the face of loss or suf­fer­ing.  After tak­ing a lit­tle time to allow the texts to sim­mer in my mind it became clear that with John the Bap­tist as our cen­tral fig­ure there was indeed a clear dif­fer­ence between being com­forted and being com­fort­able.  John did not appear inter­ested in either his own or any­one else’s com­fort.  It was John how­ever, who pre­pared the way for God’s comfort.

This too is an Advent theme.  The church is to turn itself away from the glare of hol­i­day com­fort towards the scene of insignif­i­cance and dis­com­fort in the sta­ble.  My preper­a­tion for this ser­mon also intere­sected with my read­ing of Tripp York’s recent book The Pur­ple Crown: The Pol­i­tics of Martry­dom.  It quickly became clear to me that the mar­tyrs stood firmly in the line of John the Baptist’s whose mes­sage brought him the same fate.  These wit­nesses offer an embod­i­ment of giv­ing and receiv­ing God’s com­fort.  When I first heard about the sto­ries of the mar­tyrs in my late teens I was moved by their great com­mit­ment and hero­ism. I thought that they must have been given some spe­cial mea­sure of grace and strength in that time of suf­fer­ing. My hope, of course, is that indeed they were given spe­cial grace in that time but in his book York wants to make sure that we do not sep­a­rate a martyr’s death from their life. York argues that the mar­tyrs demon­strated faith­ful­ness in death because they trained for faith­ful­ness dur­ing their life. York says that, “Obe­di­ence is a skill that devel­ops after being ini­ti­ated into a com­mu­nal life of holi­ness.”  The early church was a com­mu­nity that trained in the ways of prepar­ing for the right­eous­ness of God.

York is con­vinced that that it was the sim­ple and faith­ful prac­tices of the church that formed the peo­ple in a way that brought com­fort to those suf­fer­ing and received the com­fort that allowed them to face death. York sug­gests “that the most respon­si­ble thing a Chris­t­ian can do, for the world, is to be true to her bap­tism.” This sort of every­day­ness of the martyr’s faith leads York to ask the thor­oughly uncom­fort­able ques­tion, which is per­haps most appro­pri­ate for this time of year. He asks, “Why has the church in North Amer­ica pro­duced so few mar­tyrs? What kind of church is ours if, in an era of glut­tony, impe­ri­al­ism, [greed], and blood­lust, we can­not pro­duce peo­ple who threaten such an order?”

I am not sure how my ser­mon was received last Sun­day.  It was not a com­fort­ing mes­sage for myself.  First, I was not sure if per­haps my con­gre­ga­tion sim­ply needed to hear words of com­fort.  Were they in place were a mes­sage of that sort would have been more heal­ing and trans­fom­ring then one I offered?  Sec­ond, the demands of this mes­sage, as framed by York though flow­ing also from The Bap­tist, are per­haps too high.  God’s trans­form­ing com­fort does come through indi­vid­ual hero­ism or grand cam­paigns of action.  God’s com­fort comes through the daily and faith­ful prac­tices of the church that train and dis­ci­pline us to live daily nour­ished on God’s com­fort which is a turn­ing from the false and tem­po­rary com­forts of this world.

May we begin this Advent sea­son by turn­ing away from light, away from the com­fort­able spaces, towards what is only the hint, the rumour, of a light on the out­skirts of town.  May we learn to hear the one call­ing in wilder­ness.  And may we learn to become the ones call­ing from the wilderness.