On being ‘positively contaminated’

Unclean: Meditations on Purity, Hospitality and Mortality.
Richard Beck. Wipf & Stock, 2011, 202 pages.

June 5, 2013 | Artbeat | Number 12
Reviewed by David Driedger, Special to Canadian Mennonite

“Imagine spitting into a Dixie cup. After doing so, how would you feel if you were asked to drink the contents of the cup?” This is the opening image used by Richard Beck in Unclean to explore the relationship between disgust and morality.

Disgust is a universal cultural expression. Human beings appear to be conditioned to be repulsed by particular expressions and practices around what enters and exits our bodies. Disgust is one way of monitoring the body’s boundary. Closely related are categories of purity and contamination. Think of a glass of water into which a drop of urine is added. Can you even think about it? Even if the water is subsequently boiled and filtered, many would not want to drink it. Any trace of certain contaminants can render something unclean in our minds.

In Unclean, Beck demonstrates how humans project this psychological function into social settings. Countries, cultures and churches also work with notions of purity and contamination, often directly related to morality. They create close links between evil and disgust. This can be as simple as looking down on someone not properly dressed for church or as severe as outbursts of genocide.

In response to this reality, Beck explores Jesus’ quote from the prophets that God desires mercy and not sacrifice. Beck reads this as a move away from the holiness tradition of the Hebrew Bible, which appeals to the boundary-keeping categories of purity, contamination and disgust. Beck writes that in this area the prophetic and the priestly traditions contradict each other, and there can be no way of affirming both. To the extent that the church functions with a purity/holiness model, it will continue to reject and exclude people from fellowship.

Beck argues that Jesus reverses the traditional understanding of contamination. Jesus is not concerned with being contaminated; rather, Jesus desires to extend holiness, what Beck terms a “positive contamination.”

Beck concludes that the church needs to confront the damaging images of purity and holiness that are based on this disgust psychology. It overcomes its disgust-based morality by extending the image of love and by increasing our vulnerability, so that mechanisms of disgust are slowly dismantled.

When we love, we become more comfortable, more at home with one another. Boundaries then become aligned not with some ideal of holiness, but with a way of helping one another relate to Christ and to each other. A central image for Beck is the Eucharist, in which body, which we implicitly try to patrol; hospitality, the act of inviting someone across our boundary; and purity, the call to live in the presence of God, are all brought together.

I have some criticisms of this book. Beck’s biblical exegesis on holiness is not consistent enough in terms of the interplay between prophetic and priestly traditions of holiness. The Bible does not set them up in the neat opposition that Beck suggests. Neither does Beck give enough attention to the positive contamination of Jesus.

In spite of these minor criticisms, I highly recommend the book for churches wanting to be “holy,” and especially for churches addressing topics of human sexuality where we can be prone to categories of purity, contamination and disgust. We will need to ask ourselves whether we can recognize and acknowledge when we have been seeking sacrifice and not mercy.

David Driedger is associate pastor of First Mennonite Church, Winnipeg.

Share this page:

Comments

Does he distinguish between moral and ritual impurity? What I found quite striking in my studies of the purity laws in Deuteronomistic history is precisely that distinction. Ritual impurity was primarily physical and pretty much unavoidable. It usually required some sort of washing and time to purify. One could not enter the temple when ritually impure. Here's the clincher: in moral impurity, however, one could still enter the temple. Some of our exclusions in fellowship are no doubt based on ritual or physical impurities/disgust, but the more overt ones I think are based on moral disgust. Think of how terrible we are at welcoming former prisoners or non-heterosexuals into fellowship! More often than not, I think our disgust in these cases is directed at what we perceive as a moral impurity and not a ritual one, to use OT categories. Anyway, I think this is an important conversation to have. Looks like the OT might not be obsolete after all! ;)

Beck is clear that he is not a biblical scholar, and this is where he oversteps his boundaries a little. His main point is that humans seem to have universal function of disgust, a function that is not fixed but plastic, changing with changing conditions. And so the concern is to monitor the extent to which the disgust function gets mapped onto morality. And he here he links purity and disgust closely together and does not go into the finer points of priestly law.

I have, for a long time, been intrigued by priestly law in the Hebrew Bible. I see there a sort of early vitalism that tried to monitor the flows and breaches of life and attempted (within their internal logic and theology) to create spaces where the flow of life would increase. We have not understood or integrated this well, at all.

Great review, David. I found the same challenges in the text, though agree that beyond them the book is still very highly commendable. Beck also admits that while he is good at diagnosing the problem, he doesn't give much time or space to suggesting possible alternatives. I wished there had been more of that in the book.

For those interested, I interviewed Beck recently about the book: http://missional.ca/2013/06/unclean-interview-with-richard-beck/

Add new comment

Canadian Mennonite invites comments and encourages constructive discussion about our content. Actual full names (first and last) are required. Comments are moderated and may be edited. They will not appear online until approved and will be posted during business hours. Some comments may be reproduced in print.